Dishonest intention
Dishonest intention legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
For deciding whether or not, there appeared a dishonest intention in issuance of cheque(s), the court should take notice of the facts culminating in issuance of cheque(s)
Where issuance of cheque was backed with no meaningful transaction creating an instant liability of payment of the amount thereof, against certain consideration involved therein, no criminal accountability would prima facie accrue in case of any cheque so issued and dishonoured
Apart from any civil right or liability legally permissible thereagainst, post-dated cheques were of no value in point of criminal accountability since they were normally issued either without having funds in their respective account(s) or the parties had no paying liability of instant nature at the time of issuing
Cheques, which were issued as security so as to develop trust between the parties as a matter of normal business dealings, and were not out-come of any transaction of consideration of the time thereof, would not be a subject of criminal accountability of S.489-F, P.P.C. for want of element of relevant mens rea
Where the parties had settled their accounts or the outstanding dues became payable as instant liability and a cheque was instantly issued against such dues, which subsequently got dishonored, element of mens rea covered by the words "dishonestly issued" as used in the S.489-F, P.P.C, would be present
Where, however, a cheque had been issued towards security and understanding, with prior notice served upon the issuer to arrange payment for encashment in the bank concerned, but same cheque got dishonoured on presentation, it would carry the punitive effect of S.489-F, P.P.C.
"Dishonest intention", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938646
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dishonest intention"
P L D 1966 Dacca 552
SURJA KUMAR MALI‑Complainant Versus ULA MIAH AND OTHERS‑Accused
Court:1973
ALLAH BUX AND 3 o rxBRs-Applicant Versus THB STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondent
Court: Karachi1989 P Cr
AHMAD ALI‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2024 C L D 864
UNITED BANK LIMITED — Appellant Versus GHULAM NABI SHEIKH — Respondent
Court: Sindh2013 P Cr
SAEED AHMAD MUGHAL — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2024 M L D 243
HAMNA QAISER — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, PEMRA and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2017 P Cr
MEHMOOD KHAN — Appellant Versus SOHAIL KHAN and another — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2010 P Cr
PERVAIZ JOHN alias PERVAIZ MASIH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2011 Y L R 117
Syed TANVEER HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1990 M L D 1154
NOORDIN alias KATORE‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi