Home Maxims & Terms Political question, doctrine of meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Political question, doctrine of

Political question, doctrine of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 PLD 515 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Meaning and scope.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Political question, doctrine of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938650

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Political question, doctrine of"

PLD 2012
2011-October-4

P L D 2012 Lahore 515

Messrs HUDABIYA PAPER MILLS LTD. and others — Petitioners Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU-Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1997
Constitutional Petitions Nos.60, 67, 68 of 1996 and Civil Appeals Nos.397‑K, 399‑K of 1990 and Civil Miscellaenous Application No.913 of 1996; heard on 12th January, 1997.

1997S32

MAHMOOD KHAN ACHAKZAI ' and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN ,

Court: ‑‑‑‑Art. 239 as substituted by Revival of the Constitution of 1973 Order (14 of 1985)‑‑‑Constitution Amendment Bill‑‑‑Freedom bestowed upon the Parliament in Art.239(6) of the Constitution of Pakistan does not include power to amend those provisions of the Constitution by which would be altered salient features of the Constitution, namely, Federalism. Parliamentary Form of Government blended with Islamic provisions ‑‑‑As long as such salient features reflected in the Objectives Resolution are retained and not altered in substance, amendments can be made as per procedure prescribed in Art.239 of the Constitution.
CLC 1995
political platform and as such same have to be resolved by the executive and the legislature and not by the judiciary---Where any person was aggrieved of any policy matter or desired resolution of political issue, proper course for him would be to approach the Government through public so that matter/issue could bb taken up and-resolved through public representatives in or outside the Parliament/Assemblies---Any decision taken or policy adopted by Government would be presumed to be in public interest unless otherwise proved by cogent evidence led to the contrary---Superior Courts in exercise of power of judicial review, although are entitled to struck down excesses committed by executive authorities, yet may not interfere into the area of legislature.---[Judicial review---Administrative decision]

1995 C L C 1687

M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE — Petitioner Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2015
2015-April-13

P L D 2015 Islamabad 156

Syed ZAFAR ALI SHAH — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and 34 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2025
Civil Appeal No.188 of 2024, decided on 22nd November, 2024.

2025 P L C (C

SAIMA MIR ZAMAN Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman and others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2023
2023-March-27

2023 M L D 1105

Sheikh RASHID AHMED — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1977
10th November 1977

P L D 1977 S C 657

BEGUM NUSRAT BHUTTO-petitioner Versus CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF AND FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN-Respondents .

Court: High Court
PLD 2000
1972-April-20

PLD 2000 SC 869

Syed ZAFAR ALI SHAH and others — Petitioners Versus General PERVEZ.MUSHARRAF, CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1984
Constitutional Petition No. 190 of 1983, decided on 20th December, 1983.

1984 C L C 564

Mir ABDUS SAMAD BADINI-Petitioner Versus POLITICAL AGENT AND RETURNING OFFICER, DISTRICT CHAGHI AND 9 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Quetta
CLC 2004
2004-May-31

2004 C L C 1500

MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN TANOLI — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.E.P., PESHAWAR and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar