Home Maxims & Terms Educational policies meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Educational policies

Educational policies legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 SCMR 1841 SUPREME-COURT-OF-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Statutory professional bodiesAcademic mattersEducational policiesInterference by courtsScope

Courts are neither equipped nor have the academic or technical background to substitute themselves in place of statutory professional technical bodies and take decisions in academic matters involving standards and quality of technical education

If courts start entertaining petitions from individual institutions or students to permit courses of their choice, either for their convenience or to alleviate hardship or to provide better opportunities, or because they think that one course is equal to another, without realizing the repercussions on the field of technical education in general, that will lead to chaos in education and deterioration in standards of education

Role of statutory expert bodies on education and role of courts are well defined by a simple rule i.e. "if it is a question of educational policy or an issue involving academic matter, the courts keep their hands off but where any provision of law or principle of law has to be interpreted, applied or enforced, with reference to or connected with education, the courts will step in."

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Educational policies", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938818

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Educational policies"

GBLR 2010
N/A

2010 GBLR 460

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary G.B. Gilgit and 4 others — Petitioners Versus TAHIRA BEGUM and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Appellate Court
PLC(CS) 2007
Civil Petition No.779-P of.2003, decided on 8th November, 2005.

2007 P L C (C

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Education Department and 2 others Versus AMIL KHAN WAZIR, Director, Physical Education Government Postgraduate College, Abbottabad

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2006
Civil Petition No.779-P of 2003, decided on 8th November, 2005.

2006 S C M R 518

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Education Department and 2 others — Petitioners Versus AMIL KHAN WAZIR, Director, Physical Education Government Postgraduate College, Abbottabad — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2018
N/A

2018SCAJK1

N/A

Court: High Court
PLD 2017
2016-December-16

P L D 2017 High Court (AJ&K) 32

Ch. LATIF AKBAR, FORMER FINANCE MINISTER, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD and 8 others — Petitioners Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 10 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2016
Writ Petition No.303 of 2016, decided on 31st March, 2016.

2016 Y L R 2163

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR and 183 others — Petitioners Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, New Civil Secretariat, Muzafarabad and 7 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PTD 2011
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's Judgment Bearing Nos.420 and 421/LV of 2009 decided on 21-12-2009 rel.

2011 P T D 2476

AZIM KHAN MARWAT, SECRETARY GENERAL PAKISTAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, ISLAMABAD Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PLC(CS) 1983
Case No. 686/1010 of 1980, decided on 1st November, 1982.

1983 P L C (C

Miss FAKHUR‑UN‑NISA NAQVI Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, LAHORE DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1982
Civil Appeals Nos. 2 to 15 of 1981

P L D 1982 Supreme Court 27

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑Petitioner Versus Saved BASHIR A14MAD BUKHARI‑Respondent

Court: ‑No. 118, paras. 13 & 7 read with Punjab Nationalised Schools (Men and Women Section) Teaching Posts Rules, 1974, r. 4 and Punjab Nationalised Colleges (Men and Women Section) Teaching Posts Rules, 1974, rr. 5 & 6‑Yires of Statutes and Rules‑Purpose of enacting Regulation 118 of 1972 as its contents read with Education Policy of Government and Speech of Education Minister: Not only to nationalise but also to rationalise take over of privately owned educational insti tutions to make it workable on permanent basis, to create a unified system of education and to merge separate classes of institutions (private ly owned and Government owned) and their respective staff into one integrated whole‑Government as such obliged to lay down principle and make rules relating to method of recruitment, qualifications, seniority, creation of cadres, determination of seniority and other matters tending to facilitate integration‑Rules of 1974 having been made to regulate recruitment of staff of nationalised educational institutions and laying down terms and conditions applicable to them, hence, held, within scope of para. 13 of Regulation and not ultra vires Fazal Elahl Ejaz and 22 others v. Government of the Punjab and 13 others P L D 1977 Lah. 549 overruled.
PLC(CS) 1998
Writ Petition No. 1236 and Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 1223, 1224 of 1997, decided on 24th September, 1997.

1998 P L C (C

UME KALSOOM Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, LAHORE and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court