Home Maxims & Terms Collective opinion meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Collective opinion

Collective opinion legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Collective opinion", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938894

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Collective opinion"

PLD 1981
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1202 of 1979, decided on 27th April 1980.

P L D 1981 Karachi 50

URIS‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1992
19thMay, 1992

1992 P Cr

BAITULLAH alias BATIK alias MASTANA — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1984
Criminal Revision Application No. 13 of 1983, decided on 7th December, 1983.

1984 P Cr

ALI AKBAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE- Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1982
Criminal Revision No. 19 of 1981, decided on 7th July, 1981.

1982 P Cr

ALI SHER-Applicant Versus S. D. M. MEERPUR MATHELO AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 5 to 28 and Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 94 to 117 of 1996, decided on 5th March, 1986.

1986 P Cr

JURIO and 23 others‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Constitutional Petition No. D‑609 of 1971, decided on 8th February 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 496

ABDUL KARIM alias TARE EN‑Petitioner Versus TRIBUNAL dt A. C. AND S. D. M. AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: p. 498A dt B
MLD 1990
Criminal Appeal No. 71 of 1981, decided on 7th April, 1990.

1990 M L D 1513

MUHAMMAD YAKOOB‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Criminal Revision No. 175 of 1976, decided on 11th February 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 368

SHERO alias SHER MUHAMMAD‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Habit‑What constitutes‑How proved.‑Words and phrases.
PLD 1976
Criminal Reference No. 14 of 1974, decided on 5th December 1975.

P L D 1976 Karachi 928

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus HASSAD‑Respondent

Court: Ss. 110 & 112‑Security for good behaviour ‑Consent of person proceeded against to give security‑Held, cannot dispense with necessity of proper enquiry‑Order requiring security must be based on relevant and admissible evidence.‑Security for good behaviour.
PCRLJ 1980
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 234 of 1978, decided on 28th November, 1978.

1980 P Cr

MAROO‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi