Home Maxims & Terms Related to deceased meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Related to deceased

Related to deceased legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 SCMR 1936 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
EvidenceProsecution witnessRelated to deceasedTestimonyEvidentiary value

Mere relationship would not make a witness unworthy of reliance if his testimony was corroborated by any independent evidence or circumstances appearing on the record.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Related to deceased", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938900

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Related to deceased"

PCRLJ 1984
Criminal Appeal No.204 of 1979, decided on 27th February, 1983.

1984 P Cr

LUQMAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2006
Criminal Petition No.532-L of 2004 along with Jail Petition No.387 of 2004, decided on 3rd May, 2006.

2006 S C M R 1831

JAMIL alias SABU — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1982
Criminal Petitions for Special Leave to Appeals Nos. 276 and 289 of 1978, decided on 10th May, 1980.

1982 S C M R 315

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus NUR AHMAD AND 5 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: --Art. 185(3) read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34 Murder-case - Appreciation of evidence - Contentions: petitioner had no motive to kill deceased; eye-witnesses closely related to deceased hence unreliable; evidence of recovery doubtful-Held: Eye-witnesses though closely related to deceased yet admittedly having no previous enmity with petitioner hence no reason for them to falsely implicate petitioner -- Recovery of crime pistol from petitioner proved and pistol found by Fire Arm Expert to match with empty recovered from spot.-Witness-Evidence.
PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3566/B of 1984, decided on 15th January, 1985.

1895 P C r

AHMAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2008
Criminal Miscellaneous No.394-B of 2007, decided on 23rd May, 2007.

2008 Y L R 715

ABDUL KHALIQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1983
Criminal Petition No. 572 of 1980, decided on 8th March, 1983.

1983 S C M R 1034

MAQBOOL AHMAD-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: --Art. 185 (3)-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Contentions that there existed subsisting enmity ; witnesses closely related to deceased ; occurrence took place at such time when identification of assailants not possible and accused not supplied with copies of certain state ments-High Court rejecting such contention after detailed reasoning Question of believing or disbelieving evidence is question of.-fact-No principle of law in appraisement of evidence violated by Courts below Leave to appeal refused.-Question of fact.
PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 1980, decided on 20th May, 1985.

1985 P Cr

GULZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1988
Criminal Revision 194 of 1987, decided on 6th July, 1987.

1988 P Cr

ABDUR REHMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus REHMAT and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Revision No. 370 ‑of 1975, decided on 6th July, 1985.

1985 P Cr

Mst. MEHAR KHATOON‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HASSAN and others Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1981
Criminal Bail Application No. 785 of 1980, decided on.8thSeptember, 1980.

1981 P Cr

BAKHT ALI AND ANOTHER — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi