Home Maxims & Terms Office of President meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Office of President

Office of President legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2012 SCMR 2008 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts.41(1) & 42Office of President"Duty to treat all equally"Scope

President being head of the State represented the unity of the Republic under Art.41 of the Constitution and as per oath of his office, he had to do right to all manner of people, according to law, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will, in all circumstances

Holder of office of President, would violate the Constitution, if he failed to treat all manner of people equally and favoured any set.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Office of President", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938905

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Office of President"

CLC 1994
Writ Petition No. 732 of 1993, decided on 24th August, 1993.

1994CLC 5

Syed ZAFAR ALI SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1998
N/A

P L D 1998 Lahore 461

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARRAR — Petitioner Versus Justice MUKHTAR AHMAD JUNEJO, ACTING CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN and 6 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1996
Writ Petition No. 96 of 1996, decided on 22nd May, 1996.

P L D 1996 Azad J & K 12

Sahibzada MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE ZAFAR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SPEAKER, LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD and 3 others‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2008
2007-September-28

P L D 2008 Supreme Court 30

JAMAT-E-ISLAMI through AMIR and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others-Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1997
Writ Petition No. 127 of 1993, decided on 22nd May, 1996.

P L D 1997 Azad J & K 1

Sahibzada ISHAQ ZAFAR — Petitioner Versus Sardar MUHAMMAD ABDUL QAYYUM KHAN

Court: be to declare the offices vacant and if they were restrained from voting, such action would amount to declaring their offices vacant---Grant of interim injunction (restraining respondents from voting in Presidential Election) would frustrate provisions of Ss.5 & 9 of the Constitution which respectively relate to powers of Chief Election Commissioner to conduct elections to the office of President and right of electoral college to vote in election of President besides the power as well as duty of Speaker to cause election to the office of President occurring due to casual vacancy---Application for interim stay was rejected in circumstances. pp. 5, 6, 7 A, B & C
PLD 1998
1998-January-12

P L D 1998 Lahore 414

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR — Petitioner Versus Mr. Justice MUKHTAR AHMAD JUNEJO, ACTING CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD and 6 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2018
2018-March-19

P L D 2018 Balochistan 67

JAMEEL RAMZAN DEHWAR, ADVOCATE, SUPREME COURT AT QUETTA — Petitioner Versus SADIQ SANJRANI and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2019
2019-April-15

P L D 2019 Islamabad 422

AFZAL KHAN SHINWARI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2009
2007-September-28

P L D 2009 Supreme Court 549*

JAMAT-E-ISLAMI through AMIR and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2011
2011-May-12

P L D 2011 Lahore 382

PAKISTAN LAWYERS' FORUM through General Secretary — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents

Court: High Court