Process of elections
Process of elections legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Intelligence agencies had no role to play in the political affairs of the country such as formation or destabilization of government, or interference in holding of honest, free and fair elections
Involvement of the officers/members of secret/intelligence agencies in unlawful (political) activities, individually or collectively called for strict action being violative of oath of their offices, and if involved, they were liable to be dealt with under the Constitution and the law.
Intelligence agencies had no role to play in the political affairs of the country such as formation or destabilization of government, or interference in holding of honest, free and fair elections
Involvement of the officers/members of secret/intelligence agencies in unlawful (political) activities, individually or collectively called for strict action being, violative of oath of their offices, and if involved, they were liable to be dealt with under the Constitution and the law.
"Process of elections", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124938907
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Process of elections"
P L D 1961 (W
IRFAN AKHTAR SHAH‑Petitioner Versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, DISTRICT SHAHPUR AT SARGODHA AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:1992 C L C 1187
ARSHAD MAHMOOD and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PUNJAB LOCAL COUNCILS ELECTION AUTHORITY
Court: Lahore1988 S C M R 1986
Mrs. BENAZIR BHUTTO — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another — Respondents
Court: ---S.21, as amended by Representation of the People (.amendment) Ordinance (II of 1985) and Representation, of the People (Amendment) Ordinance (VIII of 1985) --Representation of the People (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1977, R.9 (2)--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 17(2) & 184(3)--Constitutional petition--Provisions of S.21 of the Act (as amended) are violative of Fundamental Rights contained in Art 17(2) of the Constitution in so far as they fail to recognize the existence and participation of Political Parties in the process of elections, particularly in the matter of allocation of symbols and, are for that reason void to that extent--Political Parties, therefore, 5h1) 1 tie entitled to avail of the provisions of R.9(2), Representation of the People (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1977 which empower the election Commission to allot any of the prescribed symbols to a political( party or a combination of two or more political parties who Have agreed to put up joint candidates for elections--Every political ,party, snail be eligible to-participate in the elections to every seat in the National and Provincial Assemblies scheduled to be held on the 16th November, 1988--Petition dismissed--Reasons to be recorded. later.P L D 1989 Supreme Court 66
Mrs. BENAZIR BHUTTO and. another‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another‑ ‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Art. 17 ( 2)‑‑ Representation of the 'People, Act (LXXXV of 1976), S.21 as amended by Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1985) and Representation of the .People (Fourth Amendment) Ordinance (VIII of 1985) ‑‑Provisions of S.21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976, are violative of Fundamental Rights and in so far as it fails to recognize the existence and participation of the Political Parties in the process of elections particularly in the matter of allocation of symbols and is for that reason void to that extent.1999 M L D 1933
SHAH GHULAM QADIR — Petitioner Versus IQBAL RAZZAQ BUTT and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 2010 Supreme Court 34
AURANGZEB KHAN — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2001 C L C 838
through Secretary‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
Court: Lahore2018 Y L R 173
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/APPELLATE AUTHORITY, R. Y. KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench2008 C L C 1090
Nawabzada IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN BABAR — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2008 C L C 757
SHAHZAM IMRAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD and 12 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore