Home Maxims & Terms Belated implication meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Belated implication

Belated implication legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 YLR 2532 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 497(2)Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 34Qatl-e-amd. common intentionBail, grant ofFurther inquiryBelated implicationOld age of accusedAccused was involved in the case six days after the occurrence

No worthwhile source of information regarding actual involvement of accused in the commission of the offence was put forward

Present case was one of further inquiry

Accused was aged about 64/65 years

Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances.

2014 YLR 877 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 497(2)Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 38Qatl-e-amd, common intentionBail, grant ofFurther inquiryBlind murderBelated implication

Prosecution report stated that present case was one of blind murder, and the complainant who was a passerby found body of deceased and reported such matter to the police

After almost one month of the registration of F.I.R., an alleged eye-witness of the occurrence came forward and implicated accused for the murder

Strangely alleged eye-witness of the occurrence remained silent and never disclosed fact of seeing accused commit the murder to the police for almost a month

Question as to what prompted the alleged eye-witness to disclose such fact to the police was still a mystery

Alleged confession of accused during police investigation while in custody had no evidentiary value and same could not be used against him

Prosecution had a heavy responsibility to discharge the onus of involvement of accused in the alleged crime

Present case was a classic example of a case of further inquiry

Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances.

2012 YLR 2898 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 497Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/324/34Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e-amd, common intentionBail, grant ofBelated implicationChance of consultation and deliberationNo identification parade conductedEffect

Allegation against accused and co-accused persons was that their firing resulted in the death of the deceased and also caused injuries to two persons

Complainant initially charged unknown persons in the F.I.R. for commission of the offence but subsequently charged the accused and two other persons for the same

Belated statement of complainant after a long delay in which he charged the accused lost its authenticity because of chance of consultation and deliberation

No test identification parade was conducted to prove the belated charge

One of the co-accused had been acquitted by the Trial Court

Although prosecution contended that accused remained an absconder for 14 years but bail could be granted if an accused had a good case for bail on merits and mere absconsion would not cone in his way while granting bail

Accused was granted bail, in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Belated implication", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939048

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Belated implication"

YLR 2007
N/A

2007 Y L R 919

Mst. KALSOOM BIBI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2014
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5986-B of 2013, decided on 7th January, 2014.

2014 Y L R 877

NOSHER ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2012
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1028-P of 2012, decided on 16th August, 2012.

2012 Y L R 2898

LALA JAN — Petitioner Versus NURAB KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PCRLJ 1975
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1835/B of 1974, decided on 5th July 1974.

1975 P Cr

INAYAT AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2013
2012-November-22

2013 M L D 1615

SHUJAAT HASHMI alias SHUJA — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 2005
2004-July-27

2005 P Cr

Rana NASIR ZAHEER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2011
Criminal Petition No. 387-L of 2011, decided on 13th June, 2011.

2011 SCMR 1392

SAEED KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2014
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Petition No.71-B of 2014, decided on 9th May, 2014.

2014 Y L R 2532

HAVAAS KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2010
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2967/B of 2009, decided on 1st October, 2009.

2010 Y L R 3012

GHULAM GHOUS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2003
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4555‑B of 2002, decided on 5th August, 2002.

2003 M L D 559

MUHAMMAD ARSHID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore