Public road and Government land
Public road and Government land legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Such wall could not be erected on such road/land, rather such owners for ensuring their safety ought to erect wall on their own land.
"Public road and Government land", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939201
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Public road and Government land"
P L D 2013 Sindh 60
MUHAMMAD ISSA ABBASI through Legal Representatives and others — Applicants Versus ABDUL QADIR through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1962 Dacca 356
MESSRS BUNMAN'S BUILDERS‑Petitioners Versus LAND ACQUISITION DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CHITTAGONG AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act (XIII of 1948) as amended by East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property (Amendment) Ordinance (111 of 1960), S. 3‑Question whether order of requisition was for "public purpose"‑Justiciable‑Purpose of requisition, building a "public road"‑Mere fact that road would be particularly beneficient to a private individual, would not deprive road of its character of a "public road"‑Question whether particular scheme is for "public purpose"‑Depends upon facts of particular case:2004 M L D 1936
GHULAM HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Local Government at Sindh Secretariat Karachi and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi2011 MLD 278
Haji PERWAIZ KHAN and 3 others — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY and another — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1998 Azad J&K 1
Sardar MUHAMMAD ARIF KHAN and 11 OTHERS‑‑‑Petitioners Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary,
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 4 as applicable in Azad Jammu and Kashmir‑--Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), S. 4, Fundamental Rights Nos. 13 & 14‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Entitlement to compensation for acquired land‑‑ Construction of road on land of petitioners‑‑Denial of compensation to petitioners on the ground that road was being constructed for public use out of Members Legislative Assembly Scheme, therefore, no compensation could be awarded to petitioners‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Where for any construction work, any person was deprived from use of his property, Government was bound to pay him adequate compensation‑‑‑Government could either acquire any land under provisions contained in Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or through negotiations‑‑ Petitioners having not given their consent prior to construction of road or subsequently that they would not claim compensation from Government, no justification was available to Government to deprive them of fair compensation‑‑‑Respondent's plea that land in question, having been included in Members Legislative Assembly Scheme/quota, no compensation could be granted to petitioner was in derogation of Fundamental Rights Nos.13 & 14, guaranteed by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Constitution‑‑‑Members Legislative Assembly of Azad Kashmir were supposed to take active part in the Legislation of law in the Assembly, however, if any alternate function had been given to Members Legislative Assembly even then under law of the land they could not deprive citizens of their rights guaranteed by the Constitution‑‑‑Respondents were directed to arrange for their compensation to petitioners for their land brought under construction of road.P L D 1983 Karachi 602
MULLAH GHULAM- ALI AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents
Court: S. 3 (f )-Word "public purpose"-Cannot be defined strictly as same is liable to change from time to time, from place to place and matter to matter-Definition has to be used in an elastic sense so that it may satisfy changing facts, circumstances, and requirements of society and needs of public.-Words and phrases.2012 C L C 1911
Dr. SAEEDULLAH JAFFAR and 3 others — Petitioners Versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TRAFFIC, QUETTA and 2 others — Respondents
Court: BalochistanP L D 1957 (W
THE GUJRAT‑PUNJAB BUS LTD — Plaintiff Versus (1) THE PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB,
Court: High CourtP L D 2012 Peshawar 167
GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus PAINDA RAHMAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1966 Dacca 411
Hakim AHMADUP, RAHMAN MALIK AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus (1) THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN,
Court: