State functionary
State functionary legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Any violation of the oath of office or any other illegal act committed by a State functionary was a personal act for which the individual concerned would be liable in accordance with law, and the institution to which such individual might belong would not be involved in it in any way.
"State functionary", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939210
Precedents & Case Laws citing "State functionary"
2015 C L C 1141
DILDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus D.C.O. CHINIOT and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2010 Supreme Court 1161
SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2015 M L D 512
MUHAMMAD TAHIR JAVED — Petitioner Versus DCO, CHINIOT and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1972 Rev
MALLA‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Punjab2010 M L D 1251
ABDUL QAYOOM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1997 Karachi 347
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑‑ ‑Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD DIVISION,
Court:P L D 1980 Lahore 561
HABIB JALIB — Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OP PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER
Court: Art. 199 read with Art. 4, Passports Act (XX of 1974), S. 8 and Passport Rules and Procedure, Section `D', para. 82(3), (4)-Impounding of passport-Order impounding a passport must disclose reasons for action taken-Actions of State functionaries affecting a right of a citizen-Held, subject to judicial review by superior Courts-State functionaries expected to record reasons for proposed action-Rule also applies to cases of impounding Passport for a short period-Order impounding Passport not stating in which category of para. 82 case fell and not giving reasons for action-Legality or otherwise of such order cannot be examined by High Court-.Impounding and confiscation of Passport in violation of Rules-Held, subject to correction under Art. 199-Syed Sharif-ud-Din Pirzada v. Federation of Pakistan and another P L D 1973 Kar. 132 held not applicable.P L D 1973 Lahore 733
RASHID A. KHAN‑Petitioner Versus WEST PAKISTAN RAILWAY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:2003 C L C 1874
Dr. NOOR MUHAMMAD RAJA — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY MANAGER, FESCO and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore