Home Maxims & Terms Member of Armed Forces meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Member of Armed Forces

Member of Armed Forces legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PLC(CS) 92 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 20Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionMaintainabilityMember of Armed ForcesDismissal, removal or reduction by Chief of the Air Staff or other officersNon-availability of right of appealEffect

No right of appeal is provided under any provision of Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953, to a person, removed from his service, in exercise of power under S. 20 of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 and in such situation an aggrieved person cannot be denied the right to file constitutional petition on account of Art. 199(3) of the Constitution.

2021 PLC(CS) 92 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.20Pakistan Air Force Rules, 1957, Rr. 191, 31-A, 31-B & 31Pakistan Air Force Order, O. 39-1Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional jurisdiction of High CourtScopeMember of Armed ForcesConstitutional petitionMaintainabilityMala fide of competent authorityScope

When any action of the Army Authorities regarding a serving officer of the Armed Forces, subject to any law of Armed Forces, is established to be either mala fide, coram non judice or without jurisdiction, then the same can be assailed through constitutional jurisdiction of High Court.

2020 PLD 137 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 20Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionMaintainabilityMember of Armed ForcesDismissal, removal or reduction by Chief of the Air Staff or other officersNon-availability of right of appealEffect

No right of appeal is provided under any provision of Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953, to a person, removed from his service, in exercise of power under S. 20 of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 and in such situation an aggrieved person cannot be denied the right to file constitutional petition on account of Art. 199(3) of the Constitution.

2020 PLD 428 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Pakistan Air Force Act (VI of 1953), S.20Pakistan Air Force Rules, 1957, Rr. 191 & 31-AConstitutional jurisdiction of High CourtMember of Armed ForcesConstitutional petitionMaintainabilityProtection of fundamental rightsScope

Protection of fundamental rights is on much higher pedestal than the bar contained in Art. 199(3) of the Constitution and in cases where rights have been infringed, extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 199 of Constitution can be competently invoked.

2020 PLD 428 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Pakistan Air Force Act (VI of 1953), S.20Pakistan Air Force Rules, 1957, Rr. 191 & 31-AConstitutional jurisdiction of High CourtMember of Armed ForcesConstitutional petitionMaintainabilityMala fide of competent authorityEffect

Bar of jurisdiction imposed on High Court under Art. 199(3) of the Constitution is not applicable in cases where order passed by Military Authorities is based upon mala fide or is coram non judice or without jurisdiction.

2018 PLC(CS)N 85 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Art. 199(3)Constitutional petitionMaintainabilityMember of Armed ForcesBar of jurisdictionScopePetitioner being Sailor in Pakistan Navy was discharged from serviceContention of petitioner-employee was that he was condemned unheardValidityPetitioner-employee had remained a member of Armed Forces

Article 199 (3) of the Constitution stipulated a bar to jurisdiction with regard to the matters pertaining to service of any member of Armed Forces of Pakistan

High Court could not travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the present case and interfere with any order passed under the hierarchy of Armed Forces pursuant to their applicable laws

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances

Petitioner would be at liberty to avail his remedy as provided under the applicable laws.

2013 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 243(1), 244 & 245(1)Member of Armed ForcesConstitutional dutyScope

Within the prescribed parameters, a soldier had to remain committed to defending the country against external aggression or threat of war, and subject to law, acting in aid of civil power when called upon to do so under the directions of the Federal Government

Soldier, in the course of the discharge of his duties, was obligated to seeing that the Constitution was upheld, it was not abrogated, and it was not subverted or mutilated

When a member of the Armed Forces did any of the said acts, or any other similar act, he violated his oath and rendered himself liable to action under and in accordance with the Constitution and the law.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Member of Armed Forces", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939213

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Member of Armed Forces"

PCRLJ 2003
Constitutional Petition No.D‑278 and Miscellaneous Applications Nos.675, 878 and 1705 of 2002, decided on 19th July, 2002.

2003 P Cr

ABDUL MAJEED BROHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS)N 2018
C.P. No.D-3979 of 2015, decided on 25th January, 2017.

2018 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASIF Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court
MLD 1998
1998-January-14

1998 M L D 888

NOOR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI TERRORISM COURT, BAHAWALPUR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2001
Civil Petition No. 1177 of 1999, decided on 24th January, 2001.

P L D 2001 Supreme Court 549

Ex. Lt.‑Col. ANWAR AZIZ (PA‑7122)‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 2005
Writ Petition No. 126 of 2004, decided on. 7th June, 2004

2005 P L C (C

HAVALDAR MIAN RAMZAN Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, through Chief of the Army Staff, General Headquarters, Rawalpindi

Court: Lahore High Court
SCMR 1994
Civil Petition No. 306 of 1992, decided on 5th October, 1992.

1994SCMR2286

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1997
Civil Petition No.D‑744 of 1996, decided on 19th June, 1996.

1997 C L C 13

Mrs. NAHEED MAQSOOD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1989
Writ Petition No.51 of 1979, decided on 20th June, 1989.

1989 C L C 2038

Squardon Leader (Retd.) MUSHTAQ ALI TAHIRKHELI‑‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF OF THE AIR STAFF, PAKISTAN AIR FORCE, PESHANVAR

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2015
Civil Appeals Nos. 718 and 1366 of 2007, decided on 1st April, 2015.

2015 S C M R 1071

EX-GUNNER MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ and another — Appellants Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE through Chief of Army Staff and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2018
C.P. No. D-1267 of 2010, decided on 12th September, 2017.

2018 P L C (C

ZAHEER AHMED Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance and 2 others

Court: Sindh High Court