Member of Armed Forces
Member of Armed Forces legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
No right of appeal is provided under any provision of Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953, to a person, removed from his service, in exercise of power under S. 20 of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 and in such situation an aggrieved person cannot be denied the right to file constitutional petition on account of Art. 199(3) of the Constitution.
When any action of the Army Authorities regarding a serving officer of the Armed Forces, subject to any law of Armed Forces, is established to be either mala fide, coram non judice or without jurisdiction, then the same can be assailed through constitutional jurisdiction of High Court.
No right of appeal is provided under any provision of Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953, to a person, removed from his service, in exercise of power under S. 20 of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 and in such situation an aggrieved person cannot be denied the right to file constitutional petition on account of Art. 199(3) of the Constitution.
Protection of fundamental rights is on much higher pedestal than the bar contained in Art. 199(3) of the Constitution and in cases where rights have been infringed, extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 199 of Constitution can be competently invoked.
Bar of jurisdiction imposed on High Court under Art. 199(3) of the Constitution is not applicable in cases where order passed by Military Authorities is based upon mala fide or is coram non judice or without jurisdiction.
Article 199 (3) of the Constitution stipulated a bar to jurisdiction with regard to the matters pertaining to service of any member of Armed Forces of Pakistan
High Court could not travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the present case and interfere with any order passed under the hierarchy of Armed Forces pursuant to their applicable laws
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances
Petitioner would be at liberty to avail his remedy as provided under the applicable laws.
Within the prescribed parameters, a soldier had to remain committed to defending the country against external aggression or threat of war, and subject to law, acting in aid of civil power when called upon to do so under the directions of the Federal Government
Soldier, in the course of the discharge of his duties, was obligated to seeing that the Constitution was upheld, it was not abrogated, and it was not subverted or mutilated
When a member of the Armed Forces did any of the said acts, or any other similar act, he violated his oath and rendered himself liable to action under and in accordance with the Constitution and the law.
"Member of Armed Forces", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939213
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Member of Armed Forces"
2003 P Cr
ABDUL MAJEED BROHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2018 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASIF Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Court: Sindh High Court1998 M L D 888
NOOR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI TERRORISM COURT, BAHAWALPUR and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2001 Supreme Court 549
Ex. Lt.‑Col. ANWAR AZIZ (PA‑7122)‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2005 P L C (C
HAVALDAR MIAN RAMZAN Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, through Chief of the Army Staff, General Headquarters, Rawalpindi
Court: Lahore High Court1994SCMR2286
MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1997 C L C 13
Mrs. NAHEED MAQSOOD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1989 C L C 2038
Squardon Leader (Retd.) MUSHTAQ ALI TAHIRKHELI‑‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF OF THE AIR STAFF, PAKISTAN AIR FORCE, PESHANVAR
Court: Peshawar2015 S C M R 1071
EX-GUNNER MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ and another — Appellants Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE through Chief of Army Staff and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 P L C (C
ZAHEER AHMED Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance and 2 others
Court: Sindh High Court