Home Maxims & Terms First execution application meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

First execution application

First execution application legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 YLR 1222 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 48Limitation Act ( IX of 1908), Art. 181Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), PreambleFirst execution applicationLimitationDecree-holders filed execution applications after the final order of decree of the Appellate Court

Objection raised, at the Executing Court, by the Appellant (judgment-debtor) was that the execution petitions were not filed within prescribed time from the date of original decree

Held, that after promulgation of Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, first application for execution of a decree was to be governed by residuary Art. 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and the application, made thereafter, would be governed by six years period of limitation as provided by section 48 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Record revealed the Appellant had previously assailed the judgment of the High Court through separate civil petitions, which were contested by the decree-holders and the same were dismissed by the Supreme Court not on merits but being barred by time; whereafter, execution petitions were filed

Right to file the execution petitions accrued to the respondents (decree-holders) after dismissal of appeals by the Supreme Court

Though Supreme Court did not dismiss said appeals on merits, but on limitation, because the same were contested by the respondents(decree-holders), therefore, the period of limitation, in the case, would commence from the date of judgment/order of the Supreme Court

Execution applications filed by the respondents (decree-holders) were not barred by time

Executing Court rightly dismissed the objection petitions of the appellants

Appeals were dismissed, in circumstances.

2013 SCMR 5 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 48Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 181First execution applicationCommencement of limitation periodScope

Under Art.181 of the Limitation Act, 1908 period of limitation of three years for filing of execution application would commence from the date of accrual of right.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "First execution application", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939217

Precedents & Case Laws citing "First execution application"

CLD 2015
merits---Appeal was allowed

2015 C L D 1268

UNITED BANK LIMITED — Appellant Versus FATEH HAYAT KHAN TAWANA and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2015
----S.8(3)---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 48 & O. XXI, R. 11---Execution of decree---Second execution application---Ex parte money decree was passed on 201-1-1981, by Banking Court and first application for execution of decree was filed on 27-6-1983, subsequently another application was filed on 16-1-1989---First application was consigned to record as fresh application had been filed and second was dismissed on the ground that it was barred by time---Order passed by Banking Court was maintained by High Court---Validity---First execution application was not disposed of by judicial order, therefore, second execution application filed on 16-1-1989, should plausibly be treated as continuation thereof or ancillary thereto---For ascertaining legal status and effect of proceedings before court of law, it was the content and meaning of judicial orders about such proceedings that were determinative and not the description or name given to proceedings by a party thereto, therefore, pending execution proceedings, descriptions given to by decree holder were inconsequential---Subsequent execution application filed by decree holder was deemed to be pending before Executing Court to be decided on merits---Appeal was allowed.

2015 S C M R 1335

UNITED BANK LIMITED — Appellant Versus FATEH HAYAT KHAN TAWANA and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2004
First Appeal from Order No. 189 of 1994, November, 2003.

2004 C L D 223

UNITED BANK LIMITED, BANK SQUARE BRANCH, LAHORE ‑‑‑Appellant Versus FATEH HAYAT KHAN TIWANA and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2006
N/A

2006 C L D 885

KHALID LATIF — Appellant Versus UNITED BANK LTD. SHAH ALAM MARKET, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1999
1997-October-15

1999 M L D 1432

MUHAMMAD ILYAS and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1998
1997-October-15

1998 M L D 1600

MUHAMMAD ILYAS and 4 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2017
2016-December-22

2017 C L D 1028

FAYSAL BANK LIMITED through VP/Regional Manager SAM (N) — Plaintiff/Decree Holder Versus KNIT KNOT (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive and 4 others — Defendants/Judgment Debtors

Court: Lahore
CLC 1997
and Judicial Miscellaneous No. 16 of 1995, decided on 20th May. 1997.

1997 C L C 1552

Messrs METROPOLITAN STEEL CORPORATION LTD."‑‑‑Applicant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 2008
Civil Revision No.1092 of 2002, heard on 17th October, 2007.

2008 C L C 197

MALKA and 4 others — Petitioners Versus SULTAN and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2025
N/A

P L D 2025 Lahore 286

SABIR ALI — Appellant Versus MUNAWAR and others — Respondents

Court: High Court