Protection of interest of consumers
Protection of interest of consumers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
National Electric Power Regulatory Authority ("NEPRA") was bound to protect consumers against monopolistic and oligopolistic prices
Electricity was a monopoly product of Water And Power Development Authority (WAPDA), thus NEPRA was bound to examine minutely each and every component required and used for generation of energy while ascertaining the tariff.
Electric Power Regulatory Authority was under a statutory obligation to protect the interest of consumers as well, instead of allowing the power distribution companies to raise demand of Fuel Adjustment Charges in a mechanical fashion
Scope and levy of Fuel Adjustment Charges could not be expanded and had to remain within the variations in the prices of fuel
High Court declared levy and demand of Fuel Adjustment Charges as arrears with retrospective effect as unconstitutional and against the applicable law and principles of natural justice
Power distribution companies were directed to issue amended bills and in case consumers had already paid the bills in question, then to adjust excessive amount received accordingly in the bills of coming months
Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.
"Protection of interest of consumers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939258
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Protection of interest of consumers"
2013 CLC 141
Messrs KARACHI STEEL MILLS and others — Petitioners Versus WAPDA and others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2013 Lahore 182
PAKISTAN FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION (PUNJAB BRANCH) through Vice Chairman — Petitioner Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2025 Islamabad 14
MOHSIN ABBAS — Appellant Versus SUZUKI MOTORS COMPANY LTD. through General Manager and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2010 Lahore 214
Before Dr. SHAMSHAD HUSSAIN SYED — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, LAHORE and another — Respondents
Court:2025 C L D 111
MOHSIN ABBAS — Appellant Versus SUZUKI MOTORS COMPANY LTD. through General Manager and another — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2015 Islamabad 81
MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN — Appellant Versus EXCEL-LABS, through Central Executive Officer and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2016 C L C 1104
FESCO and others — Appellants Versus Sh. JAMIL AHMAD — Respondent
Court: Lahore2024 C L D 1069
File No.376/OFT/Unilever/CCP of 2020
Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan2025 C L D 181
AJMAL — Appellant Versus S.D.O, PESCO SUB-DIVISION, NOWSHERA CANTT-01 and 3 others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2015 Lahore 204
PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATION LTD. — Petitioner Versus JUDGE DISTRICT CONSUMER COURT, GUJRANWALA and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court