Home Maxims & Terms Exploitation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Exploitation

Exploitation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 CLC 141 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Arts. 3 & 199Constitutional petitionExploitationPublic functionaryArbitrary exercise of authorityInterference by High CourtScope

Constitution did not permit exploitation of any kind or form, therefore, it casted a duty upon the High Court to protect any person from being exploited and to shield the socio-economic fibre of the country from being disrupted at the hands of executive functionaries

Consumers/citizens could not be left at the mercy of bodies, which were in an advantageous position

Arbitrary exercise of authority, mala fide actions and illegal demands were always checked by Superior Courts

Constitutional petition was allowed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Exploitation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939261

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Exploitation"

PTD 1999
Income-tax Reference No.71 of 1978, decided on 10th April, 1997.

1999 P T D 2684

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus MANORANJAN PICTURES CORPORATION (P.) LTD.

Court: 228 I T R 202
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeal No. 314 of 1993, decided on 31st May, 1994.

1994 S C M R 1829

and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE DEVLI KUND FOREST AND MULTIPURPOSES

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2000
T. C. Nos.292 and 293 of 1983 and 1374 of 1982 (References Nos. 122 and 123 of 1983 and 854 of 1982), decided on 25th March, 1998.

2000 P T D 2818

TRADERS AND TRADERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 236 I T R 269
CLC 2013
2012-October-24

2013 CLC 141

Messrs KARACHI STEEL MILLS and others — Petitioners Versus WAPDA and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PTD 1998
Tax Case No. 1279 and Reference No.779 of 1982, decided on 8th February,

1998 P T D 3431

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SIVANANDA COLOUR WORKS

Court: 223 I T R 180
PTD 2001
Tax Cases Nos.292 to 294 of 1986, decided on 15th September, 1998.

2001 P T D 3782

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus NAGI REDDI CHARITIES

Court: 241 I T R 431
PTD 2002
Tax Cases Nos.292 to 294 of 1986, decided on 15th September, 1998.

2002 P T D 1220

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus NAGI REDDI CHARITIES

Court: 241 I T R 431
PCRLJ 2022
2021-November-9

2022 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SAJID alias SAJO — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2025
27.9.2024), the Supreme Court held that the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash an FIR under Article 199 is permissible only in cases where the facts on record unequivocally demonstrate that no offence can be established against the accused, or where the registration of the FIR reflects a misuse of legal authority or lacks sound legal justification. Allowing the prosecution to continue in such circumstances would constitute an abuse of the legal process, warranting the quashing of the FIR. Cases registered without proper authority or in clear violation of established laws must also be quashed to uphold the integrity of the judicial system. However, the Court emphasized that this jurisdiction should not be invoked if the allegations in the FIR establish a prima facie case against the accused

2025 P Cr

Sadiq Hussain and another — Petitioners Versus Deputy Director, Federal Investigation Agency and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PTD 2000
Civil Writ Petition No. 1378 of 1982, decided on 10th January, 1997.

2000 P T D 1525

KISHAN CHAND Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 234 I T R 808