Home Maxims & Terms Selection for section officers meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Selection for section officers

Selection for section officers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLC(CS) 133 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
S. 7(3)Rules for Section Officers Promotional Examination-2010, Rr.4 (a) & 5(xviii)Selection for section officersEligibility criteria

Petitioner was already serving in BS-17, when she applied for the post of section officer but authorities declared her as ineligible for the post

Validity

Public notice got published by Federal Public Service Commission, as well as the Rules for Selection of Section Officers Promotional Examination-2010, revealed that all civil servants who had put in minimum 8 years of service in BS-11 to 16 were eligible for the examination

Civil servant, already serving in BS-17, having minimum eight years of service in BS-11 to 16, was not eligible for the examination

If petitioner was declared eligible for appointment as Section Officer (BS-17), same would amount to depriving civil servants serving in BS-11 to 16 from promotion/appointment as Section Officer BS-17

High Court, in exercise of appellate jurisdiction, declined to interfere in order passed by Federal Public Service Commission

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Selection for section officers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939447

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Selection for section officers"

PLC(CS) 2013
First Appeal from Order No.58 of 2011, decided on 25th November, 2011.

2013 P L C (C

SAIMA AMBREEN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division Government of Pakistan and another

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLD 1961
5th January 1959

P L D 1961 Dacca 186

MUHAMMAD SIRAJ MIAN‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL OF RAILWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2009
Income Tax Reference Application No. 379 of 2007, decided on 4th December, 2008.

2009 P T D 284

MUHAMMAD UMER Versus COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC(CS) 2012
Civil Appeal No.86 of 2010, decided on 19th February, 2011.

2012 P L C (C

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 3 others Versus Sardar ABDUL AZIZ KHAN

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLC(CS)N 2023
C.Ps. Nos.328 and 213 of 2018, decided on 19th November, 2019.

2023 P L C (C

AZMATULLAH and others Versus The UNIVERSITY OF BALOCHISTAN through Registrar and others

Court: Balochistan High Court
PLD 1991
Writ Petition No.527 of 1990, decided on 17th February, 1991.

P L D 1991 Peshawar 79

MUHAMMAD SHAHID and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR through its Vice‑Chancellor,

Court:
PLC(CS) 2013
Service Appeals Nos.25 and 45 of 2001, decided on 8th March, 2012.

2013 P L C (C

GHULAM NAUMAN SHAIKH Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Law Department, Karachi and 18 others

Court: Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal
PTD 2013
Writ Petition No.1232 of 2012, decided on 17th January, 2013.

2013 P T D 1552

NORTHERN BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PESHAWAR Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Court: Peshawar High Court
PTD 2018
W.P. No.11253 of 2017, decided on 21st March, 2018.

2018 P T D 1942

TREET CORPORATION LTD. Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2002
Appeal Nos. 87, 91 and 92 of 1998, decided on 13th December, 2001.

2002 P L C (C

SHAH MUHAMMAD ABBASI and others Versus CHANCELLOR, SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY

Court: Sindh Service Tribunal