Previous hostility between parties
Previous hostility between parties legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty, lurking house trespass or house-breaking, other hurt, rioting armed with deadly weapons
Pre-arrest bail, confirmation of
Previous hostility between parties
Mala fide of complainant F.I.R. had been lodged against accused in the past, by uncle of the complainant
No specific role had been assigned to the accused in the present case and only general allegations were levelled against him
Contention of accused that he had been falsely roped in the case for satisfying ulterior motives, could not be ruled out
Ingredient of mala fide was sine qua non for evaluating a case of pre-arrest bail and mala fide could be adjudged from facts of present case
Pre-arrest bail granted to accused was confirmed in view of the circumstances and previous hostility between the parties.
"Previous hostility between parties", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939506
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Previous hostility between parties"
1984 S C M R 488
INAYATULLAH AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: ------Ss. 302/34 & 304(1)/34 read with S. 300, Exception IV-Murder Evidence-Sentence-No previous hostility between parties and no other motive for incident excepting fight which suddenly flared up over issue of warabandi-Record not showing that accused acted in an unusual and cruel manner-Held, case of accused covered by Exception IV of S. 300-Conviction altered from S. 302 to S. 304(1)/34-Parties, however, belonging to same village arriving at compromise and accused paying a large amount of money to widow and children of deceased and also deciding to live amicably in future-Held, such circumstances should be taken into account as mitigating circumstances for reduction in sentences of accused-Sentences of imprisonment reduced to period already spent in jail-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 382-B.-Sentence.2013 M L D 130
ABDUL JABBAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore1985 S C M R 2059
ASHIQ HUSSAIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1992 P Cr
ISMAIL and 7 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi2001 Y L R 985(2)
NIHALUDDIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1991 P Cr
NAZIR AHMAD and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 2024 Balochistan 123
SHAMASULLAH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-I, QUETTA and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2022 P Cr
RIAZ — Petitioner Versus Mst. RAEELA and others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2022 M L D 1740
Syed WAJID ALI SHAH — Applicant/Complainant Versus The STATE and 2 others — Respondents/Accused
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)P L D 2013 Supreme Court 386
MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE through P.G. Punjab and another — Respondents
Court: High Court