Accused absconding
Accused absconding legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Magistrate after taking cognizance in cases triable by Sessions Court, must complete the proceedings under Ss. 87, 88 & 512 Cr.P.C, if according to challan, accused were shown as absconders.
"Accused absconding", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939521
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accused absconding"
1987 M L D 977
H A I T A M — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2000 Y L R 688
SHAHID IQBAL and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 P Cr
ARAB GUL‑‑‑Appellant Versus MIR SHAH BAZ and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar1993 P Cr
Ch. GHULAM RASOOL and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1987 S C M R 780
Mst. SHAMMO MAI‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 16 & 9(1)‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑ Bail‑‑Co‑accused absconding‑‑Effect‑‑Petitioner's application for grant of bail opposed on ground that subsequently absconding accused would appear and seek bail on basis of bail granted to petitioner‑‑Plea not tenable‑‑Court to which such bail application was made was to decide matter on merits after taking into consideration facts of his abscondence‑‑Petition converted into appeal and bail granted.‑ Abscondence .1985 P Cr
M.H. MERCHANT‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR and another Respondents
Court: Lahore1979 P Cr
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Lahore1969 P Cr
S. M. ZAHEER‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court1969 S C M R 107
S. M. ZAHEER‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1986 Peshawar 64
NOOR HASSAN‑Petitioner Versus EID AKBAR AND ANOTHER‑ Respondents
Court: