Accused on bail
Accused on bail legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Trial Court during the trial had put a question to the accused regarding recovery of dead body but the date and time mentioned therein was different from the date and time mentioned in mashirnama of recovery of dead body
No question regarding last seen evidence was put by the Trial Court
Signatures of accused were missing from his statement
Many lacunas were found in the statement of accused under S. 342, Cr.P.C, therefore, impugned judgment of Trial Court was set aside and case was remanded to the Trial Court with direction to record statement of accused afresh with all the relevant questions which were brought before the court during trial
Accused was granted bail with direction to the Trial Court to take appropriate action against him in case he misused the concession of bail
Appeal was disposed of accordingly.
"Accused on bail", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939523
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accused on bail"
2005 P Cr
Mst. SHAREEFAN BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2005 M L D 1613
Ch. SAEED AHMED — Petitioner Versus ABDUL KHALIQ BHATTI and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 P Cr
GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 Y L R 18
MUHAMMAD SULEMAN — Petitioner Versus NAZIR AHMAD and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2005 P Cr
Raja ZAHOOR AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1964 (W
MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑Petitioner Versus FARMAN SHAH AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:2018 M L D 1777
AMIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court1976 S C M R 140
FATEH SHER AND 9 OTHERS‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: --Art. 185(1) read with Criminal Procedure Code ,(V of 1898 S. 498‑Bail‑Supreme Court ordering as interim ‑ Measure that in case of preliminary inquiry being not concluded within two petitioners might renew application for interim bail‑‑Inquiry concluded within two months but some accused later appearing before Inquiry Court and asking for examination I of prosecution witnesses earlier given up by prosecution, and case consequently adjourned to another date for examination of prosecution‑Inquiry being about to conclude, not desirable, held, to release accused on bail in circumstances.Bail.1981 P Cr
MUHAMMAD LATIF AND 2 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court AJ&K2005 P Cr
BASHIR AHMAD and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar