Home Maxims & Terms Alternate adequate remedy meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Alternate adequate remedy

Alternate adequate remedy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 CLD 216 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Ss. 34 & 33Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionMaintainabilityAlternate adequate remedy

Petitioner impugned order of Securities and Exchange Commission imposing fine upon him against which his appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Bench of the Commission

Validity

Petitioner had availed right of appeal under S.33 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997 which was dismissed and further appeal to the High Court as provided by S.34 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act 1998 was available to him, which he did not avail

Constitutional Petition, was therefore, not maintainable and was dismissed, in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Alternate adequate remedy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939549

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Alternate adequate remedy"

MLD 1996
Writ Petition No.12221 of 1995, decided on 24th September, 1995.

1996 M L D 69

AURANGZEB KAMRAN ESHAI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1989
Civil Petition No.67 of 1984, decided on 5th September, 1988.

1989 S C M R 1089

MUHAMMAD AFZAL and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. SURRAYA BEGUM and others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Arts.199 & 185(3)‑‑Muhammadan Law‑‑Gift‑‑Mutation of gift entered in favour of respondents by order of Commissioner passed by him m his revisional jurisdiction and confirmed by Board of Revenue‑‑Petitioners' bid to challenge Board of Revenue's order in Constitutional jurisdiction failed‑‑Constitutional petition filed by petitioners was misconceived‑‑Question whether gift was valid or not, was a question which could only be decided by Civil Court‑‑Petitioners thus had alternate adequate remedy available to them‑‑Petitioners' case was not fit one to invoke Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court‑‑Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.‑‑Muhammadan Law.
PLD 1989
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.788 of 1984, decided on 7th November, 1988.

P L D 1989 Supreme Court 109

Hafiz MUHAMMAD ARIF DAR‑‑Petitioner Versus INCOME‑TAX OFFICER‑‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 1989
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.788 of 1984, decided on 7th November, 1988:

1989 P T D 485

HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ARIF DAR Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1094 of 1981, decided on 15th March, 1982.

1982 P T D 380

CHAUDHRY TEXTILE MILLS LTD. Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2000
N/A

2000 Y L R 2114

Mrs. RAZIA BEGUM‑ — Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD, CLIFTON

Court: Karachi
MLD 1996
Writ Petition No.8452 of 1993, decided on 8th May 1996

1996 M L D 1864

TARIQ SAEED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, ANTI‑CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 1987
Constitutional Petition No.D/277 of 1986, decided on 18th March, 1987.

1987 M L D 2440

MUHAMMAD AYUB & BROS. — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LOCAL COUNCILS,

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2005
C.P. No.S‑623 of 2003 decided on 20th October, 2003.

2005 P Cr

SHAH NAWAZ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Raja TANVEER and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1998
Civil Petition for Leave to, Appeal No.666 of 1995, decided on 19th November 1996.

1998 S C M R 2339

SAID NADEEM ELECTRO LIMITED through Chairman‑‑‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER,

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan