Home Maxims & Terms Assets and income of company meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Assets and income of company

Assets and income of company legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 CLD 114 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 290, 291 & 292Case of oppressionAssets and income of companyEntitlement

Applicants claimed to be entitled to revenues and income received from the project of the company and alleged that respondents had been usurping and grabbing the same

Validity

Property, assets and income of company belonged to it alone and shareholders did not have any interest, right or title in or to the same

Property in question belonged to company in question and was its assets and it was that company which was entitled to any income derived from it; such assets regardless of whether the construction of property in question was financed entirely by applicants

Shareholders of the company, even by unanimous decision could not themselves deal directly with company's assets and income as though they were the owners thereof, even though the shareholders could ultimately be entitled to the benefit of income by way of a payout of dividend

Two things (i.e. the company's income and a dividend declared in favour of shareholders) were in law separate and distinct

Rights and obligations purportedly created in terms of agreement between the parties with regard to property in question and income to be derived from it were unenforceable in law

Even those clauses of the agreement which could have such an effect were also unenforceable

Neither of the parties could have any legal grievance against the other with regard to any alleged "breach" of agreement in question

Alleged non-implementation of agreement in question by respondents could not form the basis of or support and action by applicants under S.290 of Companies Ordinance, 1984

Applicants had made out a case of oppression within the meaning of S.290 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 and were entitled to have brought the situation to an end

High Court declined to make an order for buyout of the shares of one group by the other, as the company was a going concern and it appeared to be a profitable one

High Court in exercise of powers under Ss.290 and 291 of Companies Ordinance, 1984, issued directions that would be to the ultimate advantage and benefit of both sides

Application was disposed of accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Assets and income of company", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939553

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Assets and income of company"

CLD 2013
2012-July-5

2013 C L D 114

Mst. NEELOFAR SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus Messrs OFSPACE (PVT.) LTD. through Company Secretary and 8 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PTD 2001
T.C. Nos.292 and 293 of 1988 (References Nos.225 and 226 of 1988), decided on 25th March, 1999.

2001 P T D 3305

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus N. BHAGAVATHY AMMAL and another

Court: 240 I T R 451
PTD 2000
I.T.R. No.509 of 1985, decided on 13th January, 1999.

2000 P T D 2798

SASWAD MALI SUGAR FACTORY LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.

Court: 236 I T R 706
PTD 2007
I.T.A. No.6032/LB of 2004, decided on 1st September, 2006.

2007 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2002
Company Petition No.44 of 1986, decided on 19th December, 1997.

2002 P T D 1638

POLYOLEFINS INDUSTRIES LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) Versus KOSMEK PLASTICS MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.

Court: 242 I T R 289
PTD 1989
Civil Appeal No.689-692 (NT) of 1975 with S.L.P.(C) No. 5324 and 5325 of 1978 decided on, 15th December, 1987.

1989 P T D 533

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LUCKNOW Versus VIKRAM COTTON MILLS LTD.

Court: Supreme Court of India
PTD 1999
Income-tax Reference No.29 of 1984, decided on 14th February, 1997.

1999 P T D 3861

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus JAYKRISHNA HARIVALLABHDAS

Court: 231 I T R 108
PTD 2008
Complaint No.1076 of 2005, decided on 25th November, 2005.

2008 P T D 1646

RECKIT BENCKISER PLC UK Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 1999
Tax Cases Nos.991 and 992 (References Nos.887 and 888 of 1984), decided on 24th July, 1996.

1999 P T D 1037

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus V. S. T. MOTORS (P.) LTD.

Court: 226 I T R 155
PTD 1999
I.T.As. Nos.4670/LB and 5200/LB of 1997, decided on 27th March, 1999

1999 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan