Home Maxims & Terms Procedure of trial meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Procedure of trial

Procedure of trial legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 CLC 1107 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
O.IX, O. IX-A, O. XV & O.XV-AProcedure of trialPrincipleClearly marked stages in a trial have been prescribed in C.P.C.

If such stages are ignored possibility of resolution of (i) disputes based on admissions, or (ii) through alternate means of dispute resolution (including compromise) or (iii) through summary judgment (without a trial of facts) dwindles

Unless claims and material in support of such claims is laid bare for the benefit of all parties, no party is incentivized to enter into a compromise, the court is unable to determine in an educated manner the issues in controversy between the parties, and has no ability to decide the matter at the first hearing or through summary judgment

This renders provisions of O IX, O.IX-A, O.XV and O.XV-A, C.P.C. redundant and results in all suits brought to the court being subjected to trial, and populates Court dockets with matters that might be resolved without trial and without inordinate delay in cases finding a resolution.

2018 PCrLJ 1363 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss.9(a), 31-A & 32Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.353Embezzlement and abscondanceAppreciation of evidenceRecording of evidence in absence of accusedArrest of proclaimed offenderProcedure of trialAccused was declared proclaimed offender who was arrested during pendency of trial of co-accused

Accused was convicted and sentenced by Trial Court for committing embezzlement and willfully remaining absconder on the basis of evidence recorded in his absence

Plea raised by accused was that evidence relied upon by Trial Court for convicting him was recorded in his absence

Validity

Trial Court had neither given opportunity to accused of cross examining witnesses who were examined in his absence except investigating officer nor framed fresh charge against co-accused already facing trial on commencement of trial against accused

Safe and proper course for Trial Court was either to pronounce judgment against co-accused on conclusion of trial against him or to have charged both accused afresh for de novo trial

Trial Court did not adopt either of the two alternatives and had committed an illegality

High Court set aside conviction and sentence awarded to accused and remanded the case to Trial Court to frame fresh charge against accused and proceed for trial afresh in accordance with law

Appeal was allowed accordingly.

2013 SCMR 203 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 375 & 376Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 184(3)Constitutional petition under Art. 184(3) of the ConstitutionGang-rapeProcedure of trialScope

For gang-rape cases, where there was a threat to the life of the victim and her family members, statements could be recorded in camera and trial could be conducted inside the jail.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Procedure of trial", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939574

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Procedure of trial"

YLR 2008
Criminal Revision No.121 of 2006, decided on 29th February, 2008.

2008 Y L R 1044

REHMATULLAH — Applicant Versus Mst. ZAHIDA and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 1987
Criminal Revision No.433 of 1976, decided on 3rd August, 1987.

1987 M L D 2219

ABDUL AZIZ — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2016
2015-March-5

2016 P Cr

KHUDA NAZAR — Applicant Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 2004
2003-September-15

2004 P Cr

QADIR BUX BHATTI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2015
2015-June-19

2015 P Cr

SHABBIR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus NOOR RAHMAN and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PCRLJ 2016
2015-August-6

2016 P Cr

The STATE — Appellant Versus Syed AAMIR SHABBIR — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1982
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1218 of 1980, decided on 10th August, 1981.

1982 S C M R 73

ABDUL ALEEM-Petitioner Versus SPECIAL JUDGE (CUSTOMS), LAHORE AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2007
2003-November-20

P L D 2007 Quetta 19

DIL MURAD and others — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Home Department and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1998
9th January 1998

P D 1998 Karachi 230

M. B. ABBASI — Applicant/accused Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1987
Criminal Revision Application' No. 95 of 1986, decided on 16th December, 1986.

P L D 1987 Karachi 110

SARFRAZ alias TEDDI AND ANOTHER‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: