Right of parties
Right of parties legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Change in substantive law, which divested and adversely affected the vested rights of the parties should always have prospective application, unless by express word of the legislation and/or by necessary intendment/implication such law had been made applicable retrospectively
Vested and substantive rights of parties should be decided according to the law which was prevalent when the action was initiated and the door of the court was knocked; and/or machinery (of the court) was set in motion.
"Right of parties", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939587
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Right of parties"
1981CLC 601
Appellant Versus SIR E, H. JAFFER & SONS LTD.‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1963 W P (Rev
RAHIM GUL AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN‑Respondent
Court: High Court1984 P L C 42
PLASTIC EMPLOYEES' UNION (REGD.) Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1987 C L C 617
Syed ABDUL MAJID‑‑Plaintiff Versus Choudhry MANZOOR‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi1986 S C M R 2007
GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Chief Secretary and another‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AJMAL and 2 others Respondents
Court: High Court1999 S C M R 1309
Chief Executive/Managing, Director — Petitioner Versus Messrs SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LIMITED,
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2002 C L D 770
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs HASHMI SONS and 16 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1981 C L C 1510
MUHAMMAD IDREES KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD
Court: Karachi1985 P Cr
Mst. KANEEZ BEGUM‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent.
Court: LahoreP L D 1979 Lahore 709
Before M. Dilawar Mahmood, J Versus ADDL. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, REVENUE ETC.-Respondents Writ Petition No. 518 of 1978, decided on 16th October, 1978.
Court: -- R. 7-Interpretation of statutes-Retrospectivity-Legislature altering rights of parties by taking away or conferring any right of action-Such enactment, unless expressly made to apply to pending actions, does not apply to pending actions nor affects them-Exception: Where enactment merely affects procedure and does not extend to right of action-Law and notification impugned not laying down their operation, to be retrospective and appeal also not being a matter or procedure but one of substantive right, right of appeal as provided by para 7 of Rules, held, continues to vest in petitioners and their case to be decided according to law as it existed when ejectment suit filed.-Interpretation of statutes-Appeal (civil).