Inquiry to regulate possession
Inquiry to regulate possession legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Magistrate while conducting inquiry in terms of S.145, Cr.P.C. was not competent to decide either title of the property or its right to possession
Section 145, Cr.P.C. only empowered the Magistrate to make an enquiry to regulate possession of the property in dispute for the time being to avert apprehension of breach of peace.
"Inquiry to regulate possession", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939594
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Inquiry to regulate possession"
2016 P Cr
HAJI MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE, LAYYAH and 10 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 S C M R 357
MUKHTIAR AHMAD and others — Petitioners Versus Haji MUHAMMAD SALEEM and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2004 P L C (C
HUMAYUN ZIA Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2009 C L C 184
MUHAMMAD UMAIR MIRZA — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIA UNIVERSITY, .MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD SAFDAR ANJUM and 4 others Versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION through Managing Director
Court: SindhP L D 1984 Peshawar 41
Haji JAUDER KHAN AND 5 OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus FALAHUDDIN AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Ss. 12 & 14‑Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 9 Award by Jirga‑Revision‑Evidence brought on record not properly appreciated, by Jirga and Chairman of Jirga endorsing in one line opinion of other members without giving his own views‑Assistant Commissioner exercising powers of Deputy Commissioner only putting his signature on decision written by someone else‑Held, a case relating to huge property dealt with in a superficial manner‑Parties to litigation losing faith in one out (if two Jirga members and application in this respect made before signing of award by members but to no effect‑Order of Additional Secretary Home and Tribal Affairs Depart. merit. remanding case for decision afresh arrived after elaborate discussion and based on material on record‑Such order, held further just and proper and made to secure ends of justice and there having been made no decision on merits no interference called for.‑Evidence1993SCMR751
Mst. BIBI FATIMA ‑‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL KARIM KHAN alias KIKI KHAN and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1985 Supreme Court 240 Present
Mehr MUHAMMAD SARWAR AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE STATE AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- O. XXVI, r. 1-Review by Supreme Court-Error crept in while Supreme 'Court recording finding which was patent on face of record-Finding reviewed suo motu and relevant portion of judgment deleted.-Review by Supreme Court.P L D 2012 Lahore 554
SAMINA ANWAAR ULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus GENERAL MANAGER, SNGPL, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1997 M L D 2055
MUHAMMAD NAZIR KHAN and 6 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus SALTANAT KHAN and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)