Home Maxims & Terms Eligibility for appointment to the post meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Eligibility for appointment to the post

Eligibility for appointment to the post legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 PLC(CS) 1326 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
AppointmentEligibility for appointment to the post

Basic requirement for the post was a typing speed of 25 words per minute, besides that 100 marks were for educational qualification and another 100 marks were for NTS (National Testify Service)

Analysis of merit list revealed that the petitioners had succeeded in obtaining qualifying marks out of 200 marks but they had failed in typing test

Court could not substitute its opinion for that of the Interview Committee

Constitutional petition was dismissed.

2013 SCMR 363 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
AppointmentEligibility for appointment to the postScope

Candidate for a post not qualifying for the same on the cut-off date set-out for applying to the post, but attaining the threshold of eligibility before passing of final order of appointment

Question as to whether such candidate should be considered for the post on merits by the appointing authority

No universal or general rule could be laid down for such a candidate, and it all depended upon the nature of office/slot, the relevant rules under which the appointment was to be made, and the requirement/conditions mentioned in the invitation/publication/ advertisement, requiring the persons to apply for the slot.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Eligibility for appointment to the post", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939596

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Eligibility for appointment to the post"

PLC(CS) 1999
Writ Petition No. 259 of 1995, decided on 26th November, 1998

1999 P L C (C

Dr. SAMIULLAH KHAN Versus N.‑W.F.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman, Peshawar and 3 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 66 of 1978, decided on 15th April, 1980.

1980 P L C (C S) 400y

SARBLAND KHAN Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF J & K

Court: Service Tribunal Azad J & K
SCMR 1999
Civil Petition for Leave to appeal No.49-P of 1999, decided on 14th May, 1999.

1999 S C M R 2786

through Chairman and another — Petitioners Versus Dr. SAMIULLAH KHAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1994
Appeal No.49(R) of 1993, decided on 29th June, 1993.

1994 P L C (C

ALI KHAN SUBHOPOTO Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and another

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 2020
Writ Petition No.763-D of 2016, decided on 27th November, 2019.

2020 P L C (C

AHSAN RASHID and 3 others Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Education (E&S), Peshawar and 21 others

Court: Peshawar High Court (D.I. Khan Bench)
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 208 of 1976, decided on 4th December, 1979.

P L C 1980 (C

WAQAR‑UL‑ISLAM Versus EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1993
Civil Appeal No. 175‑K of 1985, decided on 16th January, 1989.

1993 P L C (C

NAZIR HUSSAIN Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Education Department and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2009
Civil Petition No.237 of 2008, decided on 27th May, 2008.

2009 SCMR 25

Islamabad — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NADIR KHAN HOTI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2009
Civil Petition No.237 of 2008, decided on 27th May, 2008.

2009 P L C (C

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad Versus MUHAMMAD NADIR KHAN HOTI and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2023
Writ Petition No.3208 of 2019, decided on 16th July, 2021.

2023 P L C (C

WASEEM KHURSHID Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training and others

Court: Islamabad High Court