Motive not fully established
Motive not fully established legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Motive for the alleged occurrence was that accused and co-accused held a grudge due to a divorce obtained by their aunt, who was sister of deceased and mother of injured witness
Trial Court sentenced accused to undergo life imprisonment, while co-accused was sentenced to death
Validity
All prosecution witnesses and complainant were unanimous in narrating the occurrence and in nominating accused and co-accused for having fired at the deceased and for injuring the injured witness
Ocular account fully corroborated medical evidence on record
Witnesses remained steadfast during their cross-examination and no response could be elicited from them which could help the defence in any manner whatsoever
Although alleged motive for the occurrence was animus nursed by accused and co-accused due to the divorce obtained by their aunt, however strangely upon arriving at the scene of occurrence, they allegedly enquired about their aunt's son i.e. injured witness, rather than directing their anger at their aunt and her new husband, who were admittedly present at that time
Death of deceased and injuries caused to the injured witness were a result of sudden fight
Accused and co-accused did not repeat their fire shots despite the fact that injured witness and others were at their complete mercy
Appeal was allowed, death sentence of co-accused was converted to life imprisonment
Life imprisonment of accused was set aside, and only sentences of five years and three years, awarded to him under Ss.324 and 337-F(iii), P.P.C. respectively, were maintained.
"Motive not fully established", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939603
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Motive not fully established"
2013 S C M R 378
MUHAMMAD YASIN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1985 P Cr
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others Appellants Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: Lahore1990 S C M R 319
MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑Pc1ii inner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court1988 P Cr
MUHAMMAD TALIB and another‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1988 Lahore 676
MUHAMMAD IJAZ alias JAJJI and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑S. 302/34‑‑Interested witness‑‑Witness, father of deceased corroborated by an independent prosecution witness who had no connection with him or animus against accused‑‑Such witness could not be termed as an interested witness in absence of any motive to falsely implicate accused. ‑‑Witness.1989SCMR409
KHAN BAHADUR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court1995 S C M R 1304
JAWAD ALI ‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2007 P Cr
Raja MUSHTAQUE alias Raja YOUNIS — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1985 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and others Appellants Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: Lahore2007 Y L R 287
GHULAM HASNAIN SHAH and 3 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore