Home Maxims & Terms Participation in a dacoity meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Participation in a dacoity

Participation in a dacoity legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 297 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 302/396/412Qatl-e-amd, dacoity with murder, dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of dacoityParticipation in a dacoityLiabilityScope

Individual role of an accused, in cases of dacoity, did not matter much and every participant of such a crime, regardless of his role, would be an accused in equal degree.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Participation in a dacoity", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939620

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Participation in a dacoity"

PCRLJ 2013
2012-June-13

2013 P Cr

RASHID ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1971
Criminal Appeals Nos. 1‑D, 14‑D and 15‑D of 1970, decided on 6th October 1971.

1971 S C M R 628

ABDUL SIDDIQUE‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1992
1992-January-23

1992 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ASIF alias ACHHU and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Appellate Court
PLD 1962
Criminal Appeal No. 327 of 1959, decided on 7th July 1960.

P L D 1962 Dacca 249

NUR ALI GAZI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1967
Criminal Appeals Nos. 9‑D to 58‑D of 1963, decided on 7th September 1967.

P L D 1967 Supreme Court 545

RAMZAN ALI‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: (f) Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 400‑(Offence of belonging to a gang of dacoits)‑General evidence of bad character, though inadmissible as evidence of character, is admissible to prove "habit or association"‑Previous acquittals in cases of dacoity may even be relevant‑Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 54.
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 5 of 1985 in Criminal Appeal No. 80 of 1984, decided on 31st January, 1985.

1986 P Cr

GEEDO and others‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1957
Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 1956, decided on 23rd January 1957.

1957 Dacca 454

ISRAIL alias ISRAFIL and others — ‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑ — Respondent

Court:
MLD 1988
Criminal Appeals (Special Court) Nos. 1 and 4 of 1988/BWP, decided on 7th March, 1988.

1988 M L D 489

ALI ASGHAR‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1969
1954 Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 1954, decided on 9th December 1954.

1969 P Cr

SEKANDAR BAYATI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court
SCMR 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 1954, decided on 9th December 1954.

1969 S C M R 477

SEKANDAR BAYATI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court: High Court