Pendency of civil proceedings
Pendency of civil proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Cognizable offences were committed by accused, for which trial was in progress, when Trial Court stayed proceedings till decision of civil suit and complainants were aggrieved of that order passed by Trial Court
Validity
Although civil liability was independent of criminal liability and no invariable rule existed to the effect that pending decision of civil suit, criminal proceedings must be stayed as it was purely matter of discretion, yet while exercising discretion, guiding principle was to see as to whether accused was likely to be prejudiced if criminal proceedings were not stayed
When it was clear from gist of materials available on record that criminal liability was dependent on outcome of civil litigation regarding matter in issue, then criminal proceedings must be stayed, particularly when dispute was with regard to title of property
Normally criminal proceedings should not be postponed pending decision of civil litigation connected with same subject-matter but where it was clear that criminal liability was dependant on result of civil litigation or was so prima facie connected with it which would give rise to serious danger of grave injustice being done in the case
Complainants had already instituted civil suits alleging fraud in attestation of general power of attorney by their father and matter was sub judice before civil court, therefore, Trial Court had rightly stayed criminal proceedings pending before him till final decision of civil suits instituted by complainants
Such order of Trial Court did not call for any interference by High Court in it revisional jurisdiction
Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
"Pendency of civil proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939626
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pendency of civil proceedings"
2010 Y L R 940
BASHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1973 P Cr
ABDUL HAMID KHERA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2010 Y L R 2864
MUHAMMAD USMAN FAROOQUI — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi1996 P Cr
GHULAM QASIM — Petitioner Versus NAZIR AHMAD and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2016 M L D 278
Messrs TRUST INVESTMENT BANK LTD. through Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Home and 3 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2016 Sindh 139
SIKANDAR ZULQARNAIN — Petitioner Versus Messrs HABIB BANK LTD. and 9 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1998 M L D 1646
HAMID ABBAS — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION CHEHLYAK, MULTAN — Respondent
Court: Lahore2011 MLD 621
MUHAMMAD ATIF — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1995 P Cr
AABID A. BUTT‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2012 P Cr
MUHAMMAD TARIQ — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DUNYAPUR and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore