Home Maxims & Terms Pendency of civil proceedings meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pendency of civil proceedings

Pendency of civil proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 301 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 249-A & 265-KPenal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 420, 465 & 468Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5Cheating and forgeryPendency of civil proceedingsStay of criminal trialPrinciple

Cognizable offences were committed by accused, for which trial was in progress, when Trial Court stayed proceedings till decision of civil suit and complainants were aggrieved of that order passed by Trial Court

Validity

Although civil liability was independent of criminal liability and no invariable rule existed to the effect that pending decision of civil suit, criminal proceedings must be stayed as it was purely matter of discretion, yet while exercising discretion, guiding principle was to see as to whether accused was likely to be prejudiced if criminal proceedings were not stayed

When it was clear from gist of materials available on record that criminal liability was dependent on outcome of civil litigation regarding matter in issue, then criminal proceedings must be stayed, particularly when dispute was with regard to title of property

Normally criminal proceedings should not be postponed pending decision of civil litigation connected with same subject-matter but where it was clear that criminal liability was dependant on result of civil litigation or was so prima facie connected with it which would give rise to serious danger of grave injustice being done in the case

Complainants had already instituted civil suits alleging fraud in attestation of general power of attorney by their father and matter was sub judice before civil court, therefore, Trial Court had rightly stayed criminal proceedings pending before him till final decision of civil suits instituted by complainants

Such order of Trial Court did not call for any interference by High Court in it revisional jurisdiction

Revision was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pendency of civil proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939626

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pendency of civil proceedings"

YLR 2010
Writ Petition No.151 of 2010, decided on 12th January, 2010.

2010 Y L R 940

BASHIR AHMED — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1973
15th November 1972

1973 P Cr

ABDUL HAMID KHERA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2010
Criminal Revision Application No. 75 of 2009, decided on 22nd March, 2010.

2010 Y L R 2864

MUHAMMAD USMAN FAROOQUI — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1996
1996-February-11

1996 P Cr

GHULAM QASIM — Petitioner Versus NAZIR AHMAD and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2016
2015-September-9

2016 M L D 278

Messrs TRUST INVESTMENT BANK LTD. through Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Home and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 2016
2014-December-4

P L D 2016 Sindh 139

SIKANDAR ZULQARNAIN — Petitioner Versus Messrs HABIB BANK LTD. and 9 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1998
1995-March-26

1998 M L D 1646

HAMID ABBAS — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION CHEHLYAK, MULTAN — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2011
2010-December-6

2011 MLD 621

MUHAMMAD ATIF — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1995
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29/Q of 1994, decided on 27th September, 1994.

1995 P Cr

AABID A. BUTT‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2012
2011-July-29

2012 P Cr

MUHAMMAD TARIQ — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DUNYAPUR and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore