Home Maxims & Terms Policy making meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Policy making

Policy making legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLD 316 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional jurisdiction of the High CourtPolicy makingEconomic regulationDomain of the ExecutiveDetermining policies is not the role of the Courts and especially those, in which the Court lacks technical expertise

In cases involving utilities and economic regulation, there are good reasons for judicial restraint and/ or judicial deference to legislative judgment; it not the responsibility of the Court to regulate economic policy

Courts must confine themselves to legal interpretation

High Court must satisfy itself that there is a breach of fundamental rights, vested constitutional/legal rights before any direction is issued

Such directions must not be based on an understanding of the law which is contrary to the Constitution.

2023 CLC 1535 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 29 & 199Constitutional petitionPolicy makingJudicial reviewScope

Policy making is an executive function and is not amenable to judicial review by High Courts unless the policy falls in any of the exceptions to the general rule

Exceptions include if a policy is shown to be in violation of fundamental rights, inconsistent to Constitutional and statutory provisions, or demonstrably arbitrary, capricious, mala fide, discriminatory or unreasonable or opposed to public policy.

2023 PLC(CS) 103 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art.199Constitutional jurisdiction of High CourtPolicy makingScope

Framing of government policy is to be undertaken by the Executive, which is in a better position to decide on account of its mandate, experience, wisdom and sagacity, which are acquired through diverse skills.

2017 CLC 1 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 29Policy makingScopePolicy making is a function which is exclusively in the domain of Federal or Provincial Government as the case may be

Even Courts do not intervene in the policy matters unless such policies are perverse, ab initio void or against Constitutional guarantees

Where Federal Government or Provincial Government formulate a policy in accordance with law and under the mandate of the Constitution but not in an conformity with any policy of a private body, may it be an international body, the policy promulgated in Pakistan by its Government would prevail upon statute, policy, direction etc. of such international body.

2016 PLC(CS) 106 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionPolicy makingScope

Making policy is prerogative of government and Court in exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot make policy for government

Court cannot interfere in government policy unless there is infringement of legal rights or found to be ultra vires to the Constitution and injunction of Islam.

2015 PLD 6 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 184(3) & 199Policy makingDomain of Executive

Courts should ordinarily refrain from interfering in policy making domain of the Executive.

2015 CLC 1824 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionPolicy makingScope

Making policy is prerogative of government and Court in exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot make policy for government

Court cannot interfere in government policy unless there is infringement of legal rights or found to be ultra vires to the Constitution and injunction of Islam.

2013 PLD 167 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 29 & 38Development projectsPolicy makingFederal and Provincial Governments, domain ofScope

Functions of policy making or determining priorities of various development projects in the country, were the exclusive domain and function of the Federal and Provincial Governments, as the case might be, who had their own ministers, departments, commission and consultants, etc. for policy making and for determining priorities of various projects and their implementation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Policy making", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939630

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Policy making"

PLD 2021
2020-November-5

P L D 2021 High Court (AJK) 1

FAYYAZ AHMED JANJUA, ADVOCATE, SUPREME COURT OF AJ&K and 2 others — Petitioners Versus LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Speaker Legislative Assembly and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2013
Constitutional Petition No.28 of 2012, decided on 7th November, 2012.

P L D 2013 Supreme Court 167

WATAN PARTY and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court:
MLD 2023
2022-December-13

2023 M L D 1285

FEROZ KHAN SHUJA and others — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN MEDICAL COMMISSION through President, Islamabad and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2022
2021-October-20

P L D 2022 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 35

MUHAMMAD YASIR SAFEER MUGHAL — Appellant Versus FAYYAZ AHMED JANJUA and 6 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2012
Writ Petition No.11356 of 2009, decided on 30th May, 2012.

2012 P L C (C

Ch. AHSAN AHMAD, JUDGE ACCOUNTABILITY COURT NO.1, LAHORE and 2 others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN LAW AND JUSTICE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and another

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1997
1997-June-23

1997 C L C 174,

KHALILUR REHMAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Engineer IQBAL ZAFAR JHAGRA

Court: Election Tribunal N.W.F.P
PLC(CS) 2011
Constitutional Petitions Nos.D-1756 and D-1912 of 2009, decided on 23rd May, 2011.

2011 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD NUSRAT ALI and 3 others Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court
CLC 1988
Election Petition No. 1 of 1987 (Senate), decided on 14th November, 1981.

1988 C L C 578

Dr: Syed FAROOQ HASSAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUMTAZ AHMED KHAN‑‑Respondent

Court: Election Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1980
Writ Petition No. 6030: of 1978, decided on 28th February 1979.

P L D 1980 Lahore 802

MUHAMMAD TAHIR AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, NATIONAL GUARDS (THE NATIONAL CREDIT CORPS), RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2024
2023-July-19

2024 C L C 171

NAVEED MUSHTAQ ABBASI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)