Home Maxims & Terms Strike by law officers meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Strike by law officers

Strike by law officers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 1 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art.204Obstructing the court proceedingsStrike by law officersEffect

Court was prevented from hearing petition, as well as large number of other cases, wherein Federation was arrayed as party, because of intentional non-appearance by Federation's law officers

Cause of such non-appearance was Attorney General's personal grievance, which purportedly occurred in Federal Capital

Gripe of Attorney General held dispensation of justice to ransom throughout Pakistan on 1-10-2012

High Court declined to ignore such intentional non-appearance by law officers, as it constituted violation of their statutory duties and could also be categorized as obstructing, interrupting or prejudicing process of law

High Court took lenient view, as it was the first case of its kind and law officers might have been pressurized to become party to illegal protest to secure their respective positions

Deputy Attorney General and Standing Counsel elected not to work on 1-10-2010, therefore, there was no justification for them to be paid for that day

High Court directed government to deduct one day salary of the law officers and recommended Federal Government to treat at par other law officers of the country, who had boycotted court proceedings on 1-10-2012

Order accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Strike by law officers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939644

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Strike by law officers"

PLD 2013
2012-November-6

P L D 2013 Balochistan 1

Dr. MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY through Secretary, Islamabad — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC 1971
Industrial Relations Case No. 243 of 1970, decided on 5th September 1970.

1971 P L C 294

MAY & BAKER EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus MAY & BAKER LTD. DACCA

Court: East Pakistan Labour Court
PLC(CS) 1982
Application No. KAR‑13 of 1982, decided on 21st February, 1982.

1982 P L C 859

Syed SHAKIR HUSSAIN ZAIDI Versus ALI ANWAR GHANGRO AND ANOTHER

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind
PLC 1970
Appeal No. R I: 233 of 1969, decided on 5th January 1970.

1970 P L C 286

THE HOSIERY WORKMEN UNION Versus M. & Q. HOSIERY, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan
PLC 1976
Appeal No. LHR‑60 of 1975. decided on 24th January 1976.

1976 P L C 137

STAFF UNION Versus MESSRS INTERNATION GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC 1978
Application No. Lab./5‑4 of 1977, decided on 17th July 1977.

1978 P L C 401

MESSRS SHAMS TEXTILE MILLS LTD., CHINIOT Versus PEOPLE'S UNION

Court: Vth Labour Court Punjab
PLC 1978
Industrial Dispute No. 61 of 1973, decided on 8th November 1975.

1978 PLC 298

I. G. I. STAFF UNION, ZONAL OFFICE, LAHORE Versus ZONAL MANAGER, I. G. I., COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD.,

Court: 1st Labour Court Punjab
PLD 1969
Petition No. 35 of 1967, decided on'17th February 1967.

P L D 1969 Dacca 344

GENERAL SECRETARY, EMPLOYEES' UNION, WAPDA (E. P.), DACCA‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN, THROUGH AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLC 1971
Industrial Relations Case No. 167 .of 1970, decided on 7th May 1970.

1971 P L C 17

DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL Versus DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL KARMACHARI UNION,

Court: High Court
PLC 1976
Industrial dispute No. 7 of 1972, decided on 13th September 1974.

1976 P L C 132

STAFF UNION Versus VICE-PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, LYALLPUR

Court: Labour Court Punjab