Strike by law officers
Strike by law officers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Court was prevented from hearing petition, as well as large number of other cases, wherein Federation was arrayed as party, because of intentional non-appearance by Federation's law officers
Cause of such non-appearance was Attorney General's personal grievance, which purportedly occurred in Federal Capital
Gripe of Attorney General held dispensation of justice to ransom throughout Pakistan on 1-10-2012
High Court declined to ignore such intentional non-appearance by law officers, as it constituted violation of their statutory duties and could also be categorized as obstructing, interrupting or prejudicing process of law
High Court took lenient view, as it was the first case of its kind and law officers might have been pressurized to become party to illegal protest to secure their respective positions
Deputy Attorney General and Standing Counsel elected not to work on 1-10-2010, therefore, there was no justification for them to be paid for that day
High Court directed government to deduct one day salary of the law officers and recommended Federal Government to treat at par other law officers of the country, who had boycotted court proceedings on 1-10-2012
Order accordingly.
"Strike by law officers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939644
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Strike by law officers"
P L D 2013 Balochistan 1
Dr. MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY through Secretary, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: High Court1971 P L C 294
MAY & BAKER EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus MAY & BAKER LTD. DACCA
Court: East Pakistan Labour Court1982 P L C 859
Syed SHAKIR HUSSAIN ZAIDI Versus ALI ANWAR GHANGRO AND ANOTHER
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind1970 P L C 286
THE HOSIERY WORKMEN UNION Versus M. & Q. HOSIERY, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER
Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan1976 P L C 137
STAFF UNION Versus MESSRS INTERNATION GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD., LAHORE
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1978 P L C 401
MESSRS SHAMS TEXTILE MILLS LTD., CHINIOT Versus PEOPLE'S UNION
Court: Vth Labour Court Punjab1978 PLC 298
I. G. I. STAFF UNION, ZONAL OFFICE, LAHORE Versus ZONAL MANAGER, I. G. I., COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD.,
Court: 1st Labour Court PunjabP L D 1969 Dacca 344
GENERAL SECRETARY, EMPLOYEES' UNION, WAPDA (E. P.), DACCA‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN, THROUGH AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:1971 P L C 17
DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL Versus DELHI MUSLIM HOTEL KARMACHARI UNION,
Court: High Court1976 P L C 132
STAFF UNION Versus VICE-PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, LYALLPUR
Court: Labour Court Punjab