Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Interim order of Supreme Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Interim order of Supreme Court

Interim order of Supreme Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 10 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 189Interim order of Supreme CourtBinding effectScopeInterim order of the Supreme Court could not be disregarded

Article 189 of the Constitution stipulated that any decision of the Supreme Court shall, to the extent that it decided a question of law or was based upon or enunciated a principle of law, would be binding on all other courts in the country.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Interim order of Supreme Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939645

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Interim order of Supreme Court"

MLD 1987
Writ Petitions Nos.71, 72 and 73-R of 1987, decided on 23rd February, 1987.

1987 M L D 426

MUHAMMAD ALI and 2 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), LAHORE

Court: Lahore
PLD 2013
2012-December-19

P L D 2013 Balochistan 10

MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS ZAKAT AND USHER through Secretary and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1992
Civil Appeal No.126 of 1991, decided on 24th February, 1992.

1992 S C M R 1454

MUNIR AHMAD‑‑‑Appellant Versus BARKHURDAR and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2018
2017-November-20

2018 C L C 396

GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
PLD 2003
2003-June-12

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 808

DAR OKAZ PRINTING AND PUBLISHING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY — Appellant Versus PRINTING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 2014
2014-June-12

P L D 2014 Sindh 389

Gen. (Retd.) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF through Attorney — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2001
Civil Appeals Nos. 758, 759, 760, 761, 765, 766, 768, 769, 772, 876, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 901, 902, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935,936, 937, 938, 939, 940. 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 1302 of 1998, 348 of 1999, 48 of 2000 and Civil Petition No. 1905 of 2000, decided on 22nd March, 2001.

2001SCMR1161

Mst. ATTIYYA BIBI KHAN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2016
its own merits---If interim order was revoked on the sold ground that Supreme Court had granted leave in the matter decided by the other High Court then it would prejudice the lis before the aggrieved person was properly heard---If interim order remained operative, it would lead to discrimination, abuse of process of law and inconsistency in the orders emanating from the superior courts---Interim order passed by the High Court could not be allowed to remain in field in view of suspension order passed by the Supreme Court---Interim order passed by the High Court was allowed to be withdrawn to bring in parity and consistency amongst all the concerned without any discrimination---Interim order passed by the High Court staying the recovery of levy was vacated and recovery of amount (stayed) would be decided at the time of final decision of main constitutional petition---Applications for withdrawal of interim order were allowed in circumstances

P L D 2016 Peshawar 84

KHAZANA SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD. through General Manager — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Water and Power, Islamabad and 9 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1987
Criminal Bail Application No. 201 of 1987, decided on 12th March, 1987.

P L D 1987 Karachi 372

UMED ALI‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 2024
Civil Petitions Nos. 3472 to 3475 of 2023, decided on 29th February, 2024.

2024 P T D 1085

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LARGE TAXPAYERS OFFICE, ISLAMABAD Versus PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LTD., RAWALPINDI and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library