Home Maxims & Terms Remedy before wrong forum meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Remedy before wrong forum

Remedy before wrong forum legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 80 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. VII, Rr.10 & 11(d)Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.14Constitution of Pakistan; Art.199Constitutional petitionRejection of plaintRemedy before wrong forumCondonation of delaySuit filed by plaintiff was returned by Trial Court for presenting the same before court having jurisdictionSuit filed by plaintiff in proper court was rejected being time barredValidity

Remedy available to plaintiff was either to apply for transfer of case, if it was within the jurisdiction of same district before District Court or where proceedings were pending in one district and were intended to be transferred to another district, then jurisdiction to transfer vested in High Court to entertain such application for transfer

Such course was not adopted and on the contrary, plaintiff adopted the course which • entailed its own consequence and none else but counsel for plaintiff was responsible

Another course open to plaintiff was to have invoked provision of S. 14 of Limitation- Act, 1908, to have sought condonation of delay in pursuing remedy before wrong forum, which also counsel for plaintiff did not resort to

Plaintiff even could have challenged order passed by Trial Court in exercise of power under. O. VII, R. 10 C.P. C. before revisional Court and instead he chose to approach High Court that too much after limitation

High Court declined to interfere in order passed by Trial Court

Petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Remedy before wrong forum", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939648

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Remedy before wrong forum"

SCMR 2004
Civil Petition No.3005-L of 2000, decided on 3rd April, 2003.

2004 S C M R 145

NAZAKAT ALI — Petitioner Versus WAPDA through Manager and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2004
Civil Petition No.3005-L of 2000, decided on 3rd April, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

NAZAKAT ALI Versus WAPDA through Manager and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2024
the basis of merits rather than technicalities---Held, that the contention of the applicant / appellant was misconceived as availing the remedy within the period provided by law was not merely a technicality---Section 5 or S.14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, was not intended to add premium to the carelessness or to validate lack of vigilance and required caution by a litigant ---Application for enlargement of time by excluding the time period of about one year for pursuing remedy before wrong forum,filed by the appellant, had no substance, therefore, the same was dismissed ---Appeal was dismissed in limine, in circumstances

2024 C L C 357

AYAZ MEHMOOD — Appellant Versus MUSADAQ RIAZ and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
PLC(CS) 2000
Appeal No. 56 (L) of 1998, decided on 25th March, 1999.

P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASLAM Versus WAPDA through Chairman, WAPDA and 2 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLD 2013
2012-September-28

P L D 2013 Sindh 80

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION LTD. through General Manager — Petitioner Versus Mst. FAIZAN BIBI and 9 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2006
2005-July-6

P L D 2006 Lahore 26

MUJAHID SHAH and another — Appellants Versus SUHAIL IKRAM and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1983
Civil Petition No. 93-R of 1983, decided on 22nd May, 1983.

P L D 1983 Supreme Court 385

Mirza MUHAMMAD SAEED-Petitioner Versus SHAHAB-UD-DIN AND 8 oTH$its-Respondents

Court: Ss. 5 & 14-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 151-Condonation of delay-Courts can show indulgence and condone delay where time has been lost by prosecuting remedy before wrong forum on account of bona fide mistake or error of counsel which reasonable and prudent man despite exercising due diligence and caution might have committed - Mistake in approaching wrong forum due to gross negligence and carelessness of counsel where not appearing that counsel has shown due diligence and caution before moving wrong forum-Held, only remedy for client of such counsel to sue him for damages for loss suffered on account of his negligence-Exercise of such remedy more frequently and counsel made to pay for their carelessness and negligence may ameliorate situation.-Counsel and client.
PLC(CS) 2003
Civil Appeal No. 1326 of 1996, decided on 19th September, 2002.

2003 P L C (C

ABDUL REHMAN QAMAR Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. through Secretary Education, Peshawar and 5 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2015
N/A

2015 Y L R 2638

MUHAMMAD AYUB — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1985
Appeal No. 81(R) of 1985, decided on 6th July, 1985.

1985 P L C (C

AMIR SULAIMAN Versus MANAGER; MILITARY FARM, BANNU AND 2 OTHERS

Court: Federal Service Tribunal