Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Protracted delay meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Protracted delay

Protracted delay legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PTD 232 FEDERAL-TAX-OMBUDSMAN-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
S.122(4)Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.2(3)Audit of return, finalization ofProtracted delayEffect

Such delay would tantamount to maladministration.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Protracted delay", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939680

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Protracted delay"

PTD 2013
Complaint No.572/LHR/IT(423)/1073 of 2012, decided on 6th November, 2012.

2013 P T D 232

MUHAMMAD UMER FAROOQ Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 2012
Complaint No.483/LHR/IT(389)/970 of 2011, decided on 16th December, 2011.

2012 P T D 565

MUSSADAQ FARHAN CHUGHTAI through Muhammad Ibrahim Chughtai Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PLC(CS) 2024
N/A

2024 P L C (C

GULZAR HUSSAIN Versus The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE

Court: Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal
YLR 1999
1984 PCr.L.J. 626; 1984 PCr.LJ 2456; 1986 PCr.LJ 1246 and Muhammad Siddique v. Muhammad Baharam decided on 12‑11‑1997 ref.

1999 Y L R 2115

SARFRAZ KHAN and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Shariat Court (A J & K)
PCRLJ 2022
2021-November-11

2022 P Cr

MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Appellant Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2002
Civil Appeals Nos, 557 to 572 of 2000, decided on 25th September, .2001.

P L D 2002 Supreme Court 84

HYDERABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through M.D., Civic Centre, Hyderabad ‑‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL MAJEED and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2012
2012-February-3

2012 C L C 1316

TAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN through L.Rs. and 13 others — Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, GHAZI BAROTHA HYDRO POWER PROJECT, GHAZI and 17 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2020
Civil Appeals Nos. 46, 47, 57 and 58 of 2018, decided on 22nd November, 2018.

2020 Y L R 451

MUZAFFAR ALI ZAFFAR and 5 others — Appellants Versus The COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, MIRPUR and 16 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Revision Application No. 68 of 1981, decided on 24th October, 1984.

1985 P Cr

Syed GHULAM ALI SHAH‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE and 6 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 1987
Bail Application No.288 of 1987, decided on 24th May, 1987.

1987 M L D 2251

RASOOLZADA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library