Retrospective application
Retrospective application legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
There is no distinction between a retrospective legislation which affects rights and liabilities and that which does not do so
All legislations affect rights or liabilities; the words being used in their widest sense
Legislature either creates a right or takes away a right or restricts or enlarges a right or similarly affects liabilities
A statute is to be deemed to be retrospective, which takes away or impairs any vested right acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, or imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability in respect of transactions or considerations already past
According to this definition, the very meaning of a retrospective legislation is one that impairs any vested right or imposes a new obligation in relation to transactions already past
Retrospective is well defined: "Nova constitutio futuris formam imponere bebet, non prateritis" i.e. unless there be clear words to the contrary, statutes do not apply to a past, but to a future, state of circumstances.
Procedural laws govern the mechanisms and methodologies through which substantive rights and obligations are effectuated
This retrospective effect comports with the principle that procedural laws are designed to augment the administration of justice by ensuring that judicial proceedings are conducted with fairness and efficacy.
Statute would be deemed to be applicable from date of its promulgation, unless retrospective effect was given thereto with expression provision
Said provision, was not specifically made applicable with retrospective effect, therefore same would not apply to assessment finalized prior to its addition w.e.f. 1-7-2003.
"Retrospective application", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939723
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Retrospective application"
2019 P T D 1780
FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (FESCO) Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance, Islamabad and others
Court: Lahore High Court2025 P T D 1072
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD Versus Messrs NATIONAL PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY, JINNAH COLONY, FAISALABAD and another
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2025 S C M R 1073
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD — Petitioner Versus Messrs NATIONAL PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY, JINNAH COLONY, FAISALABAD and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1982 S C M R 418
ABDUL HALEEM-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: Art. 10 (2) (aa) as added by Houses of Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) (Second Amendment) Order 1977 (P. O. No. 7), Art. 2 read with N: W. F. P. Local Government Ordinance (1V of 1979, Ss. 28(g) & 34 (1-a)-Election-Disqualification- Retrospec tivity of statutes-Contended that disqualification under P. O. No. 5 being regarding the then "forthcoming elections" to be held in October 1977 expression "forthcoming elections" could not be invoked for elec tions in 1979, and therefore disqualification in P. O. No. 5 could not be read by reference under cl. (g) of S. 28 of Ordinance IV o f 1979 Held: Amending Order No. 7 of 1979 though not making any separate provision for retrospective application of cl. (g) of S. 28 of Ordi nance IV of 1979 yet its retrospective application inherent in language used in S. 28 itself-Section 34 (1-a) additionally strengthens such disqualification by providing for removal of a member of Local Council from his office if he "has incurred any of the disqualification S enum erated in section 28" which includes disqualification in cl. (g) of S. 28.2019 P T D 1862
ABDUL SALAM Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court2026 S C M R 558
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, PESHAWAR and others — Petitioners Versus INAYAT ULLAH and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2024 M L D 1
Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED — Petitioner Versus The CHIEF MINISTER SINDH through Chief Secretary, Karachi
Court: Sindh2024 P T D 1029
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus ZIA-UR-REHMAN
Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)P L D 2014 Lahore 72
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGINAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent
Court: High Court2014 C L D 272
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent
Court: Lahore