Home Maxims & Terms Retrospective application meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Retrospective application

Retrospective application legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 PLD 262 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Retrospective applicationScope

There is no distinction between a retrospective legislation which affects rights and liabilities and that which does not do so

All legislations affect rights or liabilities; the words being used in their widest sense

Legislature either creates a right or takes away a right or restricts or enlarges a right or similarly affects liabilities

A statute is to be deemed to be retrospective, which takes away or impairs any vested right acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, or imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability in respect of transactions or considerations already past

According to this definition, the very meaning of a retrospective legislation is one that impairs any vested right or imposes a new obligation in relation to transactions already past

Retrospective is well defined: "Nova constitutio futuris formam imponere bebet, non prateritis" i.e. unless there be clear words to the contrary, statutes do not apply to a past, but to a future, state of circumstances.

2026 PLD 140 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Procedural lawRetrospective applicationProcedural laws possess retrospective applicability unless explicitly stipulated otherwise

Procedural laws govern the mechanisms and methodologies through which substantive rights and obligations are effectuated

This retrospective effect comports with the principle that procedural laws are designed to augment the administration of justice by ensuring that judicial proceedings are conducted with fairness and efficacy.

2013 PTD 240 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.122(5A)Provision of S.122(5A) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001Retrospective applicationScope

Statute would be deemed to be applicable from date of its promulgation, unless retrospective effect was given thereto with expression provision

Said provision, was not specifically made applicable with retrospective effect, therefore same would not apply to assessment finalized prior to its addition w.e.f. 1-7-2003.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Retrospective application", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939723

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Retrospective application"

PTD 2019
Writ Petition No. 257828 of 2018, decided on 14th May, 2019.

2019 P T D 1780

FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (FESCO) Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance, Islamabad and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2025
Civil Petition No. 687-L of 2024, decided on 23rd April, 2025.

2025 P T D 1072

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD Versus Messrs NATIONAL PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY, JINNAH COLONY, FAISALABAD and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2025
Civil Petition No. 687-L of 2024, decided on 23rd April, 2025.

2025 S C M R 1073

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CORPORATE ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, FAISALABAD — Petitioner Versus Messrs NATIONAL PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY, JINNAH COLONY, FAISALABAD and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 13-R of 1982, decided on 17th February, 1982.

1982 S C M R 418

ABDUL HALEEM-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AMIN KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: Art. 10 (2) (aa) as added by Houses of Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) (Second Amendment) Order 1977 (P. O. No. 7), Art. 2 read with N: W. F. P. Local Government Ordinance (1V of 1979, Ss. 28(g) & 34 (1-a)-Election-Disqualification- Retrospec tivity of statutes-Contended that disqualification under P. O. No. 5 being regarding the then "forthcoming elections" to be held in October 1977 expression "forthcoming elections" could not be invoked for elec tions in 1979, and therefore disqualification in P. O. No. 5 could not be read by reference under cl. (g) of S. 28 of Ordinance IV o f 1979 Held: Amending Order No. 7 of 1979 though not making any separate provision for retrospective application of cl. (g) of S. 28 of Ordi nance IV of 1979 yet its retrospective application inherent in language used in S. 28 itself-Section 34 (1-a) additionally strengthens such disqualification by providing for removal of a member of Local Council from his office if he "has incurred any of the disqualification S enum erated in section 28" which includes disqualification in cl. (g) of S. 28.
PTD 2019
Writ Petition No. 249168 of 2018, decided on 24th June, 2019.

2019 P T D 1862

ABDUL SALAM Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
SCMR 2026
Civil Petition Appeals Nos. 700-P and 701-P of 2024, decided on 30th July, 2025.

2026 S C M R 558

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, PESHAWAR and others — Petitioners Versus INAYAT ULLAH and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2024
2022-October-17

2024 M L D 1

Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED — Petitioner Versus The CHIEF MINISTER SINDH through Chief Secretary, Karachi

Court: Sindh
PTD 2024
Income Tax Reference No.36 of 2022, decided on 22nd May, 2024.

2024 P T D 1029

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus ZIA-UR-REHMAN

Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)
PLD 2014
N/A

P L D 2014 Lahore 72

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGINAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLD 2014
N/A

2014 C L D 272

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent

Court: Lahore