Home Maxims & Terms Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court

Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 CLC 682 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 18Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.12Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate CourtSuit for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable propertyDetermination of value of suit for purposes of jurisdiction and court-feeScope

Appeal of appellant against order dismissing their application to be impleaded as defendants, was returned on the ground that the Appellate Court did not have pecuniary jurisdiction to hear the appeal

Validity

Bare reading of plaint depicted that value for the purposes of court-fee and jurisdiction had been given as Rupees 1000 and for determining pecuniary jurisdiction of the court, only valuation clause of plaint had to be considered and forum of appeal was not to be determined on basis of valuation ascertained by Trial Court, both for the purposes of jurisdiction and payment of court-fee

Appellate Court was, in the present case, vested with the power of entertaining the appeal and had erroneously returned the same

High Court set aside impugned order of Appellate Court and remanded the case to Appellate Court.

2013 YLR 476 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 18 [as amended]Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court

Appeal of plaintiff against order of Trial Court was dismissed on the ground that the Appellate Court did not have pecuniary jurisdiction to hear the appeal

Contention of plaintiff was that by virtue of amendments in the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 by Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance (Amendment) Act, 1986 and Punjab Civil Courts (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002 ; the jurisdiction of Appellate Court had been enhanced to Rupees 25,00,000 and accordingly the Appellate Court be ordered to decide the appeal on merits

Validity

Valuation for the purposes of pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court had been enhanced from Rupees 200,000 to Rupees 25,00,000 by virtue of Punjab Civil Courts (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002, and as the valuation of the Appellate Court had been enhanced to Rupees 25,00,000 and as matter of amendment of the law with respect to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the civil courts was a procedural matter and the amendment would take retrospective effect, therefore, the judgment of the Appellate Court was set aside, and the Appellate Court was directed to decide the appeal filed by the plaintiff in accordance with law and on merits

Revision was accepted, accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939730

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pecuniary jurisdiction of Appellate Court"

YLR 2016
C.F.A. No.11 of 2009, decided on 12th August, 2015.

2016 Y L R 277

ZAHEER ABBAS and another — Appellants Versus ALI HAIBAT and 12 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
MLD 1994
1992-December-23

1994 MLD 543

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF & Co. — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2001
Regular First Appeal No.27 of 1996, decided on 21st June, 1999.

2001 Y L R 2138

others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2013
N/A

2013 C L C 682

AZIZ-UR-REHMAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
MLD 1986
Civil Revision No.536 of 1985, decided on 4th March, 1986.

1986 M L D 2576

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL — Petitioner Versus Mst. BHAG BIBI and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2016
2012-April-10

P L D 2016 Lahore 97

MUMTAZ HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus Haji MUHAMMAD BASHIR and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2016
2015-October-6

2016 C L C 81

MUHAMMAD NADEEM — Petitioner Versus ANEESA BIBI and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2021
2020-October-7

2021 C L C 1774

SANA KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus ABDULLAH KHAN through his L.Rs. and others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
MLD 2016
2015-June-11

2016 M L D 749

Mst. ZAR TAJA BIBI — Petitioner Versus MANAGER MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK (M.C.B.) and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2012
N/A

2012 M L D 604

NIGAR BIBI and others — Petitioners Versus SALAH-UD-DIN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore