Home Maxims & Terms Running sentences concurrently meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Running sentences concurrently

Running sentences concurrently legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 YLR 548 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss.234, 397 & 561-APenal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 420Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of propertyRunning sentences concurrentlyAccused had been convicted and sentenced in two cases, which were decided on the same dateCounsel for accused invoked the provisions of S.397, Cr.P.C.Trial Court had not stated anything about two sentences running concurrently or consecutivelyHigh Court could always take curative measure in view of powers bestowed to it under Ss.234, 397 & 561-A, Cr.P.C.

Appeal being a continuation of original matter, appellate forum enjoyed the same authority and ample jurisdiction to specify nature of sentences by declaring the same to run concurrently

Sentences awarded to accused in both the cases, were ordered to run concurrently in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Running sentences concurrently", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939735

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Running sentences concurrently"

PCRLJ 2006
2005-November-18

2006 P Cr

FAYYAZ HUSSAIN and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
YLR 2010
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.222 of 2008, decided on 27th January, 2009.

2010 Y L R 214

MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2005
2005-July-4

2005 P Cr

ALI RAZA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJN 2017
2014-December-16

2017 P Cr

NAEEM T.T alias KASHIF — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 2014
2014-February-4

2014 P Cr

MUHAMMAD JAVED alias JUNAID — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2009
2009-March-30

2009 P Cr

MUHAMMAD TAHIR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 2008
2008-May-28

P L D 2008 Lahore 497

SHAHEEN TAHIR — Appellant Versus SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, FAISALABAD and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2004
2004-June-3

P LD 2004 Karachi 589

ALI AKBAR SHAH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
YLR 2005
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.487 of 2004, decided on 28th December, 2004.

2005 Y L R 1551

ABDUL MAJID — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLD 2010
2009-August-11

P L D 2010 Quetta 7

AURANGZAIB SHAH alias AURANG SHAH and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court