Proceedings at final stage
Proceedings at final stage legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Trial Court should not have acquitted accused while exercising powers under S.265-K, Cr.P.C. and instead should have concluded proceedings after examining accused, and recording evidence in defence, and decided the case on merits
Premature acquittal of accused did not create double presumption of innocence in his favour, which needed consideration while dealing with acquittal secured after judgment on merits and not one based on acquittal in intermediary stage under S.265-K, Cr.P.C.
Trial Court was not justified in accepting application under S.265-K, Cr.P.C. and recording pre-mature acquittal in favour of accused
High Court set aside order of acquittal passed by Trial Court and remanded the case to Trial Court for decision on merits
Appeal was allowed accordingly.
"Proceedings at final stage", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939756
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Proceedings at final stage"
1994 P L C 323
BUREWALA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, BUREWALA Versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, MULTAN and 3 others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 2013 Balochistan 39
THE STATE through Assistant Advocate-General, Ex-Officio and Public Prosecutor Balochistan, Quetta — Appellant Versus ABDUL WADOOD — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1952 Dacca 419
KAFILUDDIN AHMED‑Appellant Versus SURATENNESSA BIBI and others‑Respondents
Court: Case‑law discussed.2018 M L D 1262
ALAMZEB — Petitioner Versus JEHANZEB and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1999 M L D 1645
S.C. SUBJALLY — Petitioner Versus A. HAMID KHAN and another — Respondents -
Court: Lahore2004 P L C (C
Mian ATTA MUHAMMAD ZAFAR Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LOCAL GOVT. AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHORE and others
Court: Lahore High Court1999 Y L R 2159
ASHIQ HUSSAIN SHABBIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SHARIFAN BIBI and 13 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2010 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal Pakistan2002 C L C 512
Messrs QUETTA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED through Chief Executive‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Excise and Taxation, Sindh Secretariat,
Court: Karachi2007 M L D 1895
JAVED KIYANI — Appellant Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT through District Coordination Officer, Karachi — Respondent
Court: Karachi