Home Maxims & Terms Abatement of suit meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Abatement of suit

Abatement of suit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLC 1233 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XXII, R. 1Death of a partyAbatement of suitScope

Death of plaintiff or defendant would not abate the suit if right to sue survived.

2013 CLC 331 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. XXII, R. 2, O. IX R. 9 & O.VII, R.26Suit was dismissed for non-prosecution and application for restoration of the suit was also dismissedOne of the plaintiffs had died during pendency of suitAbatement of suitScope

Question as to whether after death of the plaintiff, proceedings would abate, primarily depended on the nature of the cause of action

Any action might abate on death of a party but cause of action might survive

Suit in the present case, was filed by three plaintiffs, one of which had died during pendency of suit, and as such right to sue remained alive

Dismissal of suit for non-prosecution, therefore, seemed to be illegal and contrary to the express provisions of Order XXII, Rule 2, C.P.C.

Provisions of Order XXII, R.2, C.P.C. had to be strictly construed and entire suit would not be taken to have abated simply because some of the plaintiffs had died whereas the legal representatives had not been brought on record

Court itself was competent to bring on record legal representatives of deceased plaintiff as list of legal heirs was attached with plaint in terms of Order VII, Rule 26, C.P.C.

High Court set aside the impugned orders

Intra-court appeal was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Abatement of suit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939771

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Abatement of suit"

CLC 1993
Civil Appeal No.6 of 1992, decided on 8th November, 1992.

1993 C L C 169

MUHAMAMD YASIN and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus AKRAM and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J & K
CLC 1984
Revision Application N0.51 of 1974, decided on 31st May, 1983.

1994 C L C 2564

MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ and 3 others‑‑Appellants Versus KARAM ALI TAR MUHAMMAD‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 811 of 1974, decided on 3rd February 1980.

1980 S

ALLAH BAKHSH ETC.-Petitioners Versus GHULAM SHABBIR SHAH-Respondent

Court: -- O. XXII-Abatement of suit-Sale of property to joint purchasers without specification of share purchased by each vendee and without apportionment of consideration paid by them-Such sale indivisible Death of one co-purchaser during pendency of suit-Held, resulted in total abatement of suit.-Abatement.
CLC 1981
Civil Revision No. 468 of 1971, decided on.13th Match, 1978.

1981 C L C 1390

SAID MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus ALI HUSSAIN ETC.‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1980
Regular Second Appeal No. 624 of 1965, decided on 3rd November, 1979.

1980 C L C 517

ALLAH RAKHA AND ANOTHER — .Defendants-Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AND 37 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1983
Civil Revision Application No. 63 of 1973, decided on 10th January, 1983.

1983 C L C 1346

IMDAD ALI AND 4 OTHERS‑Applicants Versus ABDUL RASHID AND 6 OTHERS‑Opponents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1992
Civil Appeal No.10 of 1991, decided on 4th November, 1991.

1992 C L C 178

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN alias MAQBOOL AHMAD ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus JAMAL DIN and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: S C (AJ&K)
MLD 2017
2016-November-7

2017 M L D 851

Mst. SAKINA KHATOON and 6 others — Plaintiffs Versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR and 5 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
PLD 1976
Civil Revision No. 194 of 1972, decided on 20th January 1976.

P L D 1976 Lahore 650

Before Aftab Hussain, J Versus Nawabzada MAJOR‑GENERAL SHER ALI KHAN AND

Court: 0. XXII, rr. 4 & 10 ‑Abatement of suit‑Rule 10 cannot be taken resort to for getting rid of rules concerning abatement‑Provision of rule permissive to enable assignee to continue suit‑Assignee failing to bring himself on record‑Held : Bound by decision against his assignor‑Application submitted by person alleging himself to be an assignee but later withdrawn without any decision‑Cannot relieve plaintiff of abatement of suit.‑Abatement.
SCMR 2000
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1221 of 1998, decided on 20th April, 1999.

2000SCMR172

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ AKBAR ABBASI — Petitioner Versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION through Managing

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan