Dispute over legal heirs
Dispute over legal heirs legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Applicant had filed application for succession certificate, which was dismissed on ground that civil court could only determine issues relating to status of legal heirs
Contention of the applicant was that even in case of dispute, Succession Certificate could still be granted under S.373, Succession Act, 1925
Validity
Section 373 of the Act related to extent of share of an applicant and was irrelevant in present case
Proceedings under the Succession Act, 1925 being summary in nature could not help in determining the issue of status of a party hence in the event of dispute regarding status of a party, the proper course would be for parties to approach the competent civil court for declaration of such disputed status and then resort to course provided under the Succession Act, 1925
Applicant, in the present case, had claimed that one of the interveners who appeared in the proceedings and claimed to be legal heir was not the actual wife of the deceased and that the deceased had divorced one of his wives, which issues could not be determined in succession proceedings
Impugnedorder whereby parties had been directed to resort to civil court regarding determination of disputed issues did not suffer from any illegality or infirmity
Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.
"Dispute over legal heirs", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939809
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dispute over legal heirs"
2013 C L C 406
AZIZ AHMED — Appellant Versus HAKIMZADI and 7 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1990 C L C 1838
AURANGZEB KHAN and 9 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Azad J & K1999 Y L R 1238
Mian ASAD TAJ‑ Petitioner Versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT COURTS, LAHORE and 12 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2018 C L C 299
Mst. SEHAT BIBI — Petitioner Versus BAHAR KHAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan (Sibi Bench)P L D 1980 Lahore 571
Mst. AMINA BEGUM — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE I,
Court: -- Sched. and Settlement Scheme No. VIII, para. 2-Resumption of property from name of original transferee-Order of resumption passed without notice to heirs of deceased transferee-Held, in clear violation of mandatory provisions of Settlement Scheme No. VIII-Such property thus resumed could not be said to be available for transfer to any other claimant-Notice served on one of heirs could not be deemed to be notice to all heirs (having conflict of interest inter se).Notice.2009 M L D 1465
Mst. RUKHSANA BANO and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus ABDUL QADIR and 2 others — Defendants
Court: Karachi1980 C L C 133
KHALID SAEED-Appellant Versus ALLAUDD1N PEHLWAN AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: Lahore1982 S C M R 22
RAMZAN AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus JAMAL DIN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: High Court2003 Y L R 365
MUHAMMAD ANWAR and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE (MISS UZMA AKHTAR
Court: Lahore1991 C L C 1155
AKBAR ALI through Legal Heirs ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus BHALU through Legal Heirs and others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: Lahore