Home Maxims & Terms Dispute over title meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Dispute over title

Dispute over title legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 PLD 282 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.28 [as amended by Registration (Sindh Amendment) Act, 2013 (VI of 2014)]Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 9 & 199Right to lifeElectricity connectionsSale deed, place of registrationJurisdictionDispute over titleCivil suit, pendency ofPetitioner was resident of housing society who sought directions for permanent electric connectionValidity

Sale deed relied upon by petitioner was executed during currency of interim orders passed in civil suit pending before High Court

False affidavit was given in the suit to procure registration of sale deed in question

Statements of officials in civil suit in question confirmed that defendants in that suit were encroachers who had conveyed title to petitioner

Revenue record declared title of land in question as fake by Board of Revenue and revenue officials were held responsible for falsifying the records who were dismissed from service

Sale deed in question was registered with Sub-Registrar having no jurisdiction over the subject property as the same fell within the jurisdiction of other Sub-Registrar

High Court declined to interfere in the matter but directed the authorities that till decision of title of subject plots/houses, temporary connections of electricity would be provided to them as the matter was already sub judice in civil suit

Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.

2013 YLR 603 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.15Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, R. 10Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionEjectment of tenantDispute over titleNecessary party

Petitioner was ex-wife of landlord and she claimed to be owner of premises and her suit for declaration against her ex-husband (landlord) was pending before civil court

Application for becoming party to ejectment proceedings was dismissed by Rent Controller and the same was maintained by Lower Appellate court

Validity

No case for interference in concurrent findings of facts recorded by two courts below was made out

Petitioner had no locus standi whatsoever to file appeal against ejectment order passed by Rent Controller, which order was not assailed by both the parties contesting rent proceedings

Petitioner claiming herself to be owner of premises, filed appeal before Lower Appellate Court, which had rightly been dismissed by said court

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Dispute over title", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939825

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dispute over title"

SCMR 1989
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.204-R of 1987, decided on 29th January 1989.

1989SCMR850

PAKISTAN through Chairman, Railway Board — Petitioner Versus KHUDA BAKHSH and 7 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No.142 of 1990, decided on 7th April, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1376

ABDUL HAMEED NAZ and 7 others — Appellants Versus Mst. RAZIA BEGUM AWAN and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1987
Civil First Appeal No.4 of 1980, decided on 9th October, 1986.

1987 M L D 580

Mst. HUSNA and 2 others — Appellants Versus MIR MUHAMMAD and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1984
Civil Appeal No. K-109 of 1981, decided on 22nd August, 1983.

P L D 1984 Supreme Court 17

MAKHAN BANO-Appellant Versus Haji! ABDUL GHANI-Respondent

Court: -- S. 13 - Default - Tenant's denial of landlord's title simpliciter does entail forfeiture under general law but cannot by itself and independently be a ground sufficient for securing his ejectment Notwithstanding contract, tenant occupying premises and his ejectment is controlled by provisions of Ordinance-Tenant's denial of landlord's title is relevant for purposes of granting or refusing him an equitable discretionary relief when such denial is coupled with a manifest breach of his statutory duties as provided under Ordinance.Muhammad Yousaj v. Abdullah P L D 1980 S C 298 held not applicable.
CLCN 2017
2017-February-27

2017 C L C Note 111

TAHIR — Petitioner Versus JEHANGIR KHAN through L.Rs and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2005
2004-September-23

P L D 2005 Karachi 47

SHOUKAT ALI and 25 others — Petitioners Versus DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REV) AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, SANGHAR and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2023
2022-July-27

2023 Y L R 2522

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Deputy Commissioner, Swabi and others — Petitioners Versus SAID AMIN and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1985
Civil Appeal No. 213 of 1979, decided on 8th October, 1984.

P L D 1985 Supreme Court 1

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH EDUCATION SECRETARY AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus Mufti ABDUL GHANI-Respondent

Court: Ss. 2(c) & 13-"Landlord"-Definition-When a person relying on opening part of definition of "landlord" in S. 2(cl, basis his claim on right to receive rent on account of ownership of property, he will have to "satisfy" Rent Controller about his title-Such person would only be adjudged as landlord if he succeeds in satisfying Rent Controller-Failure of such person to satisfy Rent Controller would result into verdict against him-If Rent Controller's satisfaction is not beyond reasonable doubt even then verdict on question of ownership would be against such person.-Words and phrases.
CLC 1991
Writ Petition No.3635 of 1990, decided on 7th July, 1990.

1991CLC99

Sh. MUHAMMAD HANIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NISAR and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2024
2022-August-19

2024 M L D 1785

Hunain alias Moon — Appellant Versus Murad Bakhsh — Respondent

Court: Balochistan