Home Maxims & Terms Attempt to commit offence meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Attempt to commit offence

Attempt to commit offence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 PCrLJN 58 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court Judicial Precedent
S. 497Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 377, 377-B, 341 & 511Un-natural offenceWrongful restraintAttempt to commit offenceBail, grant ofDelay in conclusion of trialScopeProsecution case was that the accused attempted to commit sodomy/unnatural offence upon the victim

High Court had directed the Trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of six months but despite lapse of about seven months the Trial Court had failed to comply with the direction

Perusal of order sheets of the Trial Court revealed that the witnesses had remained absent on seven dates of hearing

Only one adjournment was sought on behalf of the accused as his counsel was not present

Accused was arrested on 11-11-2018 and since then he was in judicial custody and despite framing of charge on 04-05-2019 as yet proceedings had not been concluded nor was there any reasonable probability of concluding trial in near future

Petition for grant of bail was allowed, in circumstances.

2017 PCrLJN 205 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Ss. 511 & 109Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss.155 & 561-AAbetmentAttempt to commit offenceApplication for quashing of FIRComplainant could not point out as to which offence was abetted or attempted

Both offences (abetment and attempt), would become cognizable only when the main offence (attempted or abetted) was cognizable

When there was no mention of any abetted or attempted offence, registration of case under Ss.511/109, P.P.C., was without lawful authority

Offences as alleged in the FIR, were not made out against accused and continuance of the proceedings in the case, would amount to abuse of the process of the court and would be futile exercise and wastage of time

No cognizable offence having been made out, same would constitute non-cognizable offence and in view of S.155(1), Cr.P.C., Police could forward the complaint to the concerned Magistrate, or applicant could file a private complaint against accused persons

If any investigation was required, that could be done by Police under subsection (2) of S.155, Cr.P.C., after obtaining permission of the competent Magistrate

Police had no power to arrest accused

FIR was quashed, in circumstances.

2013 YLR 714 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 511Attempt to commit offence

'Attempt', though had not been defined anywhere in the Penal Code, but to constitute an attempt, it was necessary that offender should take every step; and should do all that was necessary to commit the offence attempted

Offence would remain short of commission on account of some interruption from outside.

1968 SCMR 533 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 411/414 read with S. 511-Attempt to commit offence-Punishment awarded cannot exceed one half of maximum provided by substantive offence-Maximum sentence under Ss. 411/414 : 3 years-Sentence of 2 years R. I. under Ss. 411/414 read with S. 511-Illegal.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Attempt to commit offence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939835

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Attempt to commit offence"

PLD 2026
2025-March-27

P L D 2026 Sindh 211

The STATE through Prosecutor General, Sindh — Applicant Versus NIKSON MALIK — Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1968
Criminal Revision No. 109 of 1968, decided on 26th June 1968.

1968 P Cr

UMAR ALI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Opposite-Party

Court: Dacca
PCRLJ 1968
Criminal Appeal No. K-3 of 1968, decided on 14th February 1968.

1968 P Cr

ZAINUL ABDIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Supreme Court
YLR 2000
Writ Petition No. 2374‑Q of 2000, decided on 30th May, 2000.

2000 Y L R 2811

SAQLAIN AKBAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CITY, RAJANPUR and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2023
2020-September-14

2023 M L D 578

MAQBOOL AHMED — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
MLD 2022
2021-September-23

2022 M L D 993

Mian SHAHZAD IQBAL — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PCRLJ 2004
Bail Application No.779 of 2003 decided on 13th August, 2003.

2004 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ABDUL SADIQ‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2003
Criminal Appeal No.291 of 2003, decided on 22nd May, 2003.

2003 P Cr

Mrs. HAMIDA ALTAF‑‑‑Appellant Versus LIAQAT ALI and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2018
2017-May-26

2018 P Cr

KARAMAT ARAIN and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Larkana Bench)
YLR 2013
Criminal Bail Application No.S-461 and M.A. No.2370 of 2012, decided on 8th January, 2013.

2013 Y L R 937

ALI HASSAN and 2 others — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh