Agriculture machinery
Agriculture machinery legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
First Appellate Authority set aside the order-in-original and ordered for release of machinery imported under PCT Heading 8438.6000 on the ground that machinery fell under Cl. (13)(1) of Serial No.1 of the S.R.O. 575(1)/2006 dated 5-6-2006; that since the functions performed by the machinery imported were similar to the functions of machinery of PCT Heading 8438.6000 (Machinery for preparation of Fruits, Nuts or Vegetables), the same was correctly classifiable under such heading; and classification (PCT Heading 8438.8090) determined by the adjudicating officer was set aside
Revenue contended that importer's declaration was "Ethinic Snack Frying System "; that by nomenclature of declared description was not covered under PCT Heading 8436.6000; and that by considering the provisions of Rr. 3(3), 3(c) & 4 of the general rules for interpretation of harmonized system the imported Snack Frying System was correctly classifiable under PCT Heading 8438.8090
Validity
Catalogue of machinery showed that it was an all-in-one type of advance machine which performs multiple functions such as shelling (in case of nuts), peeling (in case of pulses), dough making, batter mixing, frying by means of beat wave frying system, seasoning, filling and packing of such agricultural products as peanuts, green peas, almonds, pulses
Products were agro-products and machinery imported was meant for performing various processes on them from production of namkeen snacks
Evidence on record categorically established that importer was in the business of production of namkeen food items and that 98% of such products were being exported
Machinery fell under Cl.(13)(1) of Serial No.1 of the S.R.O. 575(1)/2006 dated 5-6-2006 and the benefit of such notification was admissible to the same
Since functions performed by the machinery imported were similar to the functions of machinery of PCT Heading 8438.6000 (Machinery for preparation of Fruits, Nuts or Vegetables) through the change of PCT Headings and claim of the same thereon were of no use nor there was any violation committed by the importer nor made any ntisdeclaration at the time of claiming the exemption but the same was in accordance with law
No illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the First Appellate Authority having been found same was up-held by the Appellate Tribunal
Departmental appeal being devoid of merits was rejected.
"Agriculture machinery", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124939924
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Agriculture machinery"
2005 P T D 1913
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/ WEALTH TAX, FAISALABAD ZONE, FAISALABAD Versus Messrs ZARI INDUSTRIES
Court: Lahore High Court1989 M L D 1451
ALTAF & SONS‑‑-Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and others‑‑-Respondents
Court: Karachi1987 P T D (T rib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan1995 P L C (C
MUSTAFA KHAN Versus MEMBER (CUSTOMS) C.B.R., ISLAMABAD and 3 others
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2003 C L C 91
GHULAM MUSTAFA and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus BASHIR AHMAD and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2003 P T D 1805
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, CENTRAL ZONE-B, KARACHI Versus Messrs PAKISTAN MACHINE TOOL FACTORY LTD., KARACHI
Court: Karachi High Court2002 P T D 2890
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, CENTRAL, ZONE‑B, KARACHI Versus Messrs PAKISTAN MACHINE TOOL FACTORY LTD., KARACHI
Court: Karachi High Court1983 S C M R 482
SHAFAAT AHMAD QURESHI AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: - Art. 212 (3) read with Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4 and Irrigation Engineers Service (Class I) Rules, 1967-Appoint ment-Promotion-Civil servant cleared by Public Service Commission for appointment as X'EN=Pending decision by Government in such regard making written request that as he had no intention of being inducted into Class I first and then appointed as permanent X'EN, he be appointed as officiating X'EN on pay and allowances last drawn by him-Request of civil servant accordingly acted upon by Govern ment-Tribunal, on appeal of civil servant challenging order of Govern ment, accepting his assertion that his request being to his own detriment could not have been written of his own volition-Leave to appeal Granted to Provincial Government to consider contentions (i) that Department having acted upon written request of civil servant, he had no locus poenitentiae specially when such request had not been speci fically retracted and (ii) that question of his promotion as XEN was a matter for Government to decide, Tribunal could not arrogate to itself power of ordering such appointment.-Civil service.1987 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ANWAR HAKIM Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT and 32 others
Court: Service Tribunal Punjab1990 P L C (C
GHULAM NABI UNAR Versus SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others
Court: Service Tribunal Sindh