Doctrine of equity
Doctrine of equity legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Public trust resource could not be converted into private use or any other use other than a public purpose.
Authorities auctioned off urban evacuee land in dispute and after receiving full consideration allotted the same to the respondents and issued Provisional Transfer Orders (PTOs) and Permanent Transfer Deeds (PTDs) in their favour
Petitioners' claimed that their predecessor-in-interest had before independence, mortgaged land in dispute to a mortgagee (evacuee) in lieu of consideration, vide registered mortgage deed; that land in dispute was redeemed after payment of mortgage money, therefore allotment of the same in the name of the allotees was unlawful and its possession should be handed over to petitioners
Settlement Commissioner after holding detailed inquiry rejected claim of the petitioners
Constitutional petition filed by petitioners before High Court against order of Settlement Commissioner was also dismissed
Validity
Land in dispute was in the name of evacuee even prior to partition (i.e. 1947)
Settlement Commissioner after conducting a detailed inquiry and having examined the record keeper and relevant record of Municipal Corporation came to the conclusion that site plan of house constructed on land in dispute was approved in the name of evacuee as far back as 12-9-1943, which was much before the alleged mortgage deed
After partition houses and plots constructed on the property were put to auction by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner and after receiving full payment, Provisional Transfer Orders (PTOs) and Permanent Transfer Deeds (PTDs) were issued
Even in the Permanent Transfer Deed (PTDs) issued, name of evacuee appeared in the ownership column
Khasra number in revenue record was shown to be in the name of evacuee
No evidence was led to show that there was any element of fraud in issuance of Permanent Transfer Deeds (PTDs) or in possession of the property
Settlement Commissioner had found that either there was an exchange of land or the predecessor-in-interest of petitioners had sold the land in dispute to the evacuee much before partition
Evacuee owner had constructed house on land in dispute prior to partition and to the knowledge of the predecessor-in-interest of petitioners, but no steps were taken by the latter to restrain the construction
High Court also refused to interfere in order of Settlement Commissioner for the reason that it would be inequitable since it would result in uprooting a number of families who had been built houses and had been living there since long
Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed in circumstances and leave was refused.
"Doctrine of equity", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940006
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Doctrine of equity"
PLD 2002 Azad J&K 9
MUHAMMAD HAFIZ KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ALI ASGHAR alias ASGHAR ALI and 5 others‑‑‑Non‑Petitioners
Court:PLD 2002 Azad J&K 9
MUHAMMAD HAFIZ KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ALI ASGHAR alias ASGHAR ALI and 5 others‑‑‑Non‑Petitioners
Court:1998 P T D 2769
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SUKKUR ZONE, SUKKUR through The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-I, Quetta. Versus Messrs GATRON (INDUSTRIES) LTD, QUETTA
Court: Quetta High Court2021 P L C (C
FAKHR UD DIN and 34 others Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, through Secretary
Court: Peshawar High Court1987 P L C (C
Lt.-Col. (Retd.) Syed HASNAIN AHMAD Versus THE SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2002 C L C 662
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE through Legal Heirs and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. MARZIA SULTANA and 44 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1985 Lahore 461
KALU-Petitioner Versus Hafiz ABDUL RASHID AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:P L D 2011 Karachi 405
Haji MUHAMMAD USMAN — Applicant Versus ABDUL SATTAR and 7 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1964 (W
Mst. KHURSHID JAN‑Appellant Versus FAZAL DAD‑Respondent
Court: (iii) How are the Courts to be guided in case of conflict of views among the founders of different Schools of Muslim Law and their disciples, other Imams and Faqihs last question as amended by the Full Bench.2013 S C M R 706
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN through LRs. — Petitioners Versus ANSAR BASHIR AC and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan