Home Maxims & Terms Production of postman meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Production of postman

Production of postman legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 CLC 1245 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.13Demand of pre-emptionTab-i-IshhadProduction of postmanScope

Only duty of the pre-emptor is to dispatch the notice under cover of registered AD (acknowledgement due) with a proper address of the vendee and to prove it that notice was properly dispatched from the post office, if the facility is available, he is not required to serve it upon the vendee either himself or through postman, rather it is the duty of the postman

If it is not served, postman while appearing before the court will explain it and in case if the addressee denied the receipt of notice then his statement can serve the purpose of sending of a notice through registered envelope under acknowledgement due.

2013 YLR 947 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 13 & 6Talb-i-IshhadProduction of postman

Suit for possession through pre-emption was dismissed concurrently on finding of non-performance of Talb-i-Ishhad, as postman was not produced as a witness by the plaintiff

Validity

On basis of available record, it was established that plaintiff did not produce postman to prove the due performance of Talb-i-Ishhad therefore he had not proved due performance of Talb-i-Ishhad and was not entitled to pre-emption decree

Appeal was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Production of postman", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940074

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Production of postman"

CLCN 2017
2016-October-7

2017 C L C Note 94

AMIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD TAJ — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
CLCN 2017
2017-April-18

2017 C L C Note 209

ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUL SATTAR — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
CLC 2017
2016-February-22

2017 C L C 923

MUHAMMAD IDREES — Appellant Versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD YAQOOB and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (D.I. Khan Bench)
YLR 2021
Civil Revision No. 934 of 2011, decided on 20th September, 2016*.

2021 Y L R 1776

Mst. SAFEENA SHAHEEN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
YLR 2021
MUHAMMAD TAJ---Respondent Civil Revision No. 94 of 2012, decided on 4th October, 2016*.

2021 Y L R 1445

AMIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD TAJ — Respondent Civil Revision No. 94 of 2012, decided on 4th October, 2016*.

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
YLR 2021
Civil Revision Petition No. 946-P of 2012, decided on 22nd June, 2020.

2021 Y L R 803

FAQIR SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus Mst. BAKHT BIBI (Widow) and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2021
2020-May-8

2021 C L C 483

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ — Petitioner Versus SAHIB ZADA and 9 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2014
2013-October-30

2014 M L D 1148

IFTIKHAR AHMED — Petitioner Versus ZAHID HUSSAIN and 10 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2015
Civil Revisions Nos.145 and 218 of 2009, decided on 31st May, 2013.

2015 Y L R 766

GHULAM MUHAYUDDIN — Petitioner Versus HABIBUR REHMAN — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
YLRN 2020
Civil Revision No.576 of 2014, decided on 23rd April, 2019.

2020 Y L R Note 16

MUKHTIAR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)