Negligence and carelessness
Negligence and carelessness legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
For the purpose of negligence and carelessness and the duty to take care, the essentials were that negligence in the sense of mere carelessness, would not give rise to any cause of action
Carelessness, however, would assume legal quality of negligence where there was duty to take care and where failure in that duty had caused damages
Duty to take care was, thus, an essential ingredient of the "tort of negligence" and unless such duty was established, no case of actionable negligence could arise.
"Negligence and carelessness", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940122
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Negligence and carelessness"
1993 S C M R 256
GHULAM MUSTAFA SHAH‑‑‑Appellant Versus HAJI through Legal Heirs and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1983 Supreme Court 385
Mirza MUHAMMAD SAEED-Petitioner Versus SHAHAB-UD-DIN AND 8 oTH$its-Respondents
Court: Ss. 5 & 14-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 151-Condonation of delay-Courts can show indulgence and condone delay where time has been lost by prosecuting remedy before wrong forum on account of bona fide mistake or error of counsel which reasonable and prudent man despite exercising due diligence and caution might have committed - Mistake in approaching wrong forum due to gross negligence and carelessness of counsel where not appearing that counsel has shown due diligence and caution before moving wrong forum-Held, only remedy for client of such counsel to sue him for damages for loss suffered on account of his negligence-Exercise of such remedy more frequently and counsel made to pay for their carelessness and negligence may ameliorate situation.-Counsel and client.1986 P Cr
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF BALOCH Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1988 S C M R 1968
MUHAMMAD IQBAL HAIDRI — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, JHANG and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1991 P L C (C
MUSHTAQ AHMAD Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT and another
Court: Service Tribunal Azad J&K2003 C L C 885
SABRAN BIBI and 7 others — Appellants Versus WAPDA through Chairman, WAPDA House — Respondent
Court: Lahore1989 P L C 866
KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus TAJ BAREEN
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind1984 M L D 1030
S. MUNAWAR ALI — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA — Respondent
Court: Karachi2013 M L D 743
Mrs. ALAM ARA — Appellant Versus Dr. SHAISTA TARIQ — Respondent
Court: Peshawar2007 M L D 1653
Ltd. Col (Retd.) M. AKRAM ABBASI and another — Appellants Versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS — Respondents
Court: Karachi