Duty to take care
Duty to take care legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
For the purpose of negligence and carelessness and the duty to take care, the essentials were that negligence in the sense of mere carelessness, would not give rise to any cause of action
Carelessness, however, would assume legal quality of negligence where there was duty to take care and where failure in that duty had caused damages
Duty to take care was, thus, an essential ingredient of the "tort of negligence" and unless such duty was established, no case of actionable negligence could arise.
"Duty to take care", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940123
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Duty to take care"
1994 C L C 1903
S. IQBAL HUSSAIN JAFFERY‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY‑‑‑Defendant
Court: Karachi2013 M L D 743
Mrs. ALAM ARA — Appellant Versus Dr. SHAISTA TARIQ — Respondent
Court: Peshawar2000 C L C 1926
CHAIRMAN, WAPDA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus NASEER AHMED ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1994 M L D 1495
HASSAN NAWAZ KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MULTAN through Mayor — Respondent
Court: Lahore2001 CLC221
through Managing Director and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD MOOSA‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1997 C L C 507
KARIM BUKSH ‑‑‑ Plaintiff Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION
Court: Karachi1997 C L C 925
MUHAMMAD MOOSA‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1995 M L D 113
SAIRA and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ZONAL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION‑‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1952 Lahore 89
THE IMPERIAL BANK OF INDIA, LAHORE — Defendant‑Appellant Versus M. M. AZIM‑Plaintiff‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1965 Supreme Court 665
RABIA KHATUN‑Appellant Versus AZIZUDDIN BISWAS AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: