Home Maxims & Terms Legislative powers of Federation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Legislative powers of Federation

Legislative powers of Federation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLC 143 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 90, 97, 99 & 137Legislative powers of FederationScope

Federation could legislate law for implementing the International Conventions, treaties and agreements, but if main subject of Labour was within the Legislative domain of Province, the Federation could direct the Provinces to implement international treaties, agreements etc.; and frame laws in conformity with the International Labour Conventions

Scheme of the Federation of Pakistan was based on the concept of Co-operative Federalism; and the Federation had the authority on behalf of Provinces to sign international agreement, treaties and give guarantee for their implementation

Provinces were bound to honour the commitments of the Federation made through International treaties and conventions

Provinces could not legislate in violation of International Conventions or undertakings and guarantees extended by the Federation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Legislative powers of Federation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940186

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legislative powers of Federation"

MLD 1994
Writ Petition No.1368 of 1994, decided on 26th February, 1994.

1994 M L D 1842

BILAL FIBRES LIMITED — Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1980
Suit No. 157 of 1972, decided on 10th December 1979.

P L D 1980 Karachi 275

PAKISTAN INVESTMENT LTD.-Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS-Defendants

Court: Ss. 2(dd), 3, 4 & First Sched. as amended by Finance Ordinance (XI of 1970) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Fifth Sched., Item 26 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Third Sched., Item 43(b) Word "excise"-History, meaning, scope and signification-Levy of excise duty on intangible items, in contrast to tangible items-Not a new or unknown concept introduced by Finance Ordinance, 1970 Definition of term "excise duty" not given in Constitution (1962) No restriction can, therefore, be placed on legislative power of Federal Legislature-Held, term "excise duty" being susceptible to intangible items, it can also cover a levy on services rendered or provided-Amendments introduced in Act and its First Sched. By Finance Ordinance, 1970-Held, intra vires of powers of Central Legislature.-Words and phrases-Interpretation of statutes.
PLC 2013
Writ Petitions Nos.1579 and 5081 of 2012, decided on 12th April, 2012.

2013 P L C 143

Syed IMRAN ALI SHAH Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Human Resources (HR) Division, Islamabad and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
MLD 2013
2012-December-4

2013 M L D 433

MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Wasif Khalid and 22 others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of Pakistan and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLC 2012
Writ Petitions Nos.24691 to 24695 of 2011, decided on 13th March, 2012.

2012 P L C 219

Ch. BASHARAT ALI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Labour and Manpower Division

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2022
Constitution Petitions Nos.D-4778 to D-4780 of 2021, decided on 8th October, 2021.

2022 P T D 266

PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. through Authorized Officer and others Versus PAKISTAN / FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry Finance and others

Court: Sindh High Court
PLD 1956
Constitutional Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1955, decided on 14th February 1956 from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Dacca, dated the 8th March 1955, in Criminal Appeal No. 363 of 1954.

P L D 1956 Federal Court 395

MUHAMMAD YUSUF‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2026
2025-December-11

P L D 2026 Federal Constitutional Court 29

ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LTD. — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN and another — Respondents

Court: Federal Constitutional Court
PLD 2024
2022-December-30

P L D 2024 Sindh 453

IRFAN HUSSAIN HALAI through his duly constituted attorney and 20 others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division Ministry of Finance and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2025
I.C.A. No.13108 of 2023 (and other connected Appeals), decided on 26th June, 2024.

2025 P T D 313

Mrs. SHEHLA TARIQ SAIGOL Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court