Home Maxims & Terms Specific allegation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Specific allegation

Specific allegation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 MLD 480 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court Judicial Precedent
Ss. 302 & 34Qatl-i-amd, common intentionAppreciation of evidenceSpecific allegationPolice witnessDamaging concessionsScopeAccused persons were alleged to have murdered the deceased by making fire shotsAccused persons were named in the FIR with specific allegation of opening fire shots on the deceased

Empties secured from the place of occurrence were found to have been fired from the weapon recovered from the possession of accused persons

Eye-witnesses had fully implicated the accused persons for the commission of offence

Presence of eye-witnesses was not challenged during their deposition in the Trial Court

Concessions extended by the police officials as a result of their pre-design meeting and already settled understanding could not be considered fatal in the peculiar circumstances of the case

Prosecution had established the case against both the accused beyond any shadow of doubt

Convictions/sentences awarded to the convicts was maintained in toto

Appeals were dismissed.

2013 YLR 1158 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 497Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 324, 114 & 34Qatl-e-amd, attempt to commit qatl-e-amd, abettor present when offence is committed, common intentionBail, refusal ofDay time incidentSpecific allegationOcular evidence corroborating medical evidenceEffectAccused party allegedly intercepted the complainant side and started firing upon themAccused was specifically alleged to have caused firearm injuries to the deceasedIncident was a day time occurrenceName of accused with a specific role transpired in the F.I.R. as well as in statements under S.161, Cr.P.C.

Prosecution witnesses disposed in the same line before the Trial Court and categorically stated that accused had caused the fatal firearm injury to the deceased

Ocular and medical evidence were in the same line to the effect that firearm injuries were caused to the deceased, who succumbed to the said injuries

Case of accused did not fall within the meaning of S.497(2), Cr.P.C.

Bail application of accused was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Specific allegation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940282

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Specific allegation"

PCRLJ 1994
22ndDecember, 1993

1994 P Cr

MUMTAZ AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2006
Criminal Miscellaneous No.879-B of 2005, decided on 10th October, 2005.

2006 Y L R 2488

ABDUL LATIF and 3 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1998
Case No. 4A(62) and 24(66) of 1997, decided on 18th March, 1997.

1998 P L C 62

AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAH Versus ATTOCK REFINERY LIMITED through General Manager, Rawalpindi

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission
PCRLJ 2014
2012-December-20

2014 P Cr

SAIF ULLAH SALEEM ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2004
2004-July-12

2004 P Cr

NAMDAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1993
1993-August-7

1993 P Cr

Mst. YASMEEN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1987
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2168/13 of 1986, decided on 17th September, 1986.

1987 P Cr

AKHMAD AHMAD alias AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2004
Criminal Bail Application No.D-764- of 2003, decided on 5th December, 2003.

2004 Y L R 806

GHULAM RASOOL — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2013
2012-January-2

2013 M L D 454

LIAQAT ALI — Applicant Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2010
Criminal Bail Application No.507 of 2009, decided on 24th July, 2009.

2010 Y L R 693

ALI GOHAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi