Home Maxims & Terms Robbery or dacoity meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Robbery or dacoity

Robbery or dacoity legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 YLR 1364 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 390, 391, 392 & 395Robbery or dacoityAppreciation of evidenceAll three witnesses were unanimous that the number of culprits committing offence was four

Neither the case of dacoity falling within terms of S.391, P.P.C. was made out, nor the punishment provided by S.395, P.P.C. could be inflicted upon any accused

Conviction and sentence awarded to accused persons under S.395, P.P.C., were not warranted

Accused were liable to be punished with offence of robbery under S.392, P.P.C., in circumstances

Impugned judgment was modified by substituting the conviction under S.392, P.P.C. and High Court while taking lenient view awarded sentence of 7 years' R.I. with fine, and with benefit of S.382-B, Cr.P.C. in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Robbery or dacoity", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940292

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Robbery or dacoity"

PLD 1971
Criminal Appeal No. 865 of 1967, decided on 15th April 1971.

P L D 1971 Lahore 776

KHADIM alias KHOONI — ‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE — ‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 2024
2022-August-19

2024 P Cr

Abdul Hadi alias Babul and 2 others — Applicants Versus The State — Respondent

Court: Balochistan
PLD 1963
15th October 1963

P L D 1963 Supreme Court 737

AHMAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2013
2012-July-3

2013 P Cr

KHAISTA MEER and another — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 2025
its own particular facts and circumstances;

2025 P Cr

Naveed John Bhatti and others — Appellants Versus The State — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 1950
Criminal Appeal No. 933 of 1949, decided on 25th April, 1950, from the order of Magistrate with section 30 powers, Gujranwala, dated 5th October 1949.

P

SHEROO and others‑Appellants Versus CRO W N‑Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 2024
its own particular facts and circumstances;

2024 P Cr

Summair — Appellant Versus The State and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
YLR 2007
N/A

2007 Y L R 646

MUHAMMAD ARSLAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE through Station House Officer, Police Station, Ghulam

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1971
N/A

1971 S C M R 763

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2025
2024-July-11

2025 P Cr

Ayazullah — Appellant Versus The State — Respondent

Court: Sindh