Home Maxims & Terms Reduction in surety amount meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reduction in surety amount

Reduction in surety amount legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 YLRN 445 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 9 (b)Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 561-AReduction in surety amountPassport, release ofPetitioners were granted pre-arrest bails against furnishing of surety bonds and deposit of their original passportsPetitioners sought reduction in surety bond and return of their passportsValidityAmount of surety along with deposit of passport was not a conditional bail

Securing passports was in fact itself a surety and was neither a conditional bail nor a condition required to be incorporated in the bail bond itself

Petitioners did not disclose as to why passports were needed and no specific details of intended travel had been disclosed

Nothing was pleaded as to inability of petitioners to continue with amount of surety already furnished by them while seeking bails

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

2013 PCrLJ 1028 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 514Bail bond, forfeiture ofReduction in surety amountResponsibility of surety for appearance of the accusedScopeBoth the petitioners stood surety for accused, who was granted bailWhile on bail, accused committed murder of his co-accused and abscondedBail bonds of Rs.80,000 each submitted by petitioners were forfeited to the extent of Rs.50,000 eachValidity

Record showed that intention of petitioners was clear and they produced accused before the court and trial was under process, when accused committed murder of his co-accused and absconded

Responsibility of petitioners was fulfilled the moment accused started attending the court/trial

Keeping in view the peculiar circumstances of abscondence of accused and the financial status of petitioners, one of whom was a wage labourer and the other a low paid pensioner, the amount of Rs.50,000 seemed to be too harsh

Revision petition was allowed, amount of surety forfeited was reduced from Rs.50,000 each to Rs.10,000 each and petitioners were directed to continue making efforts for production of accused and Trial Court was advised to further half the forfeited amount, if accused was produced in a month's time.

2013 MLD 872 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 514Bail bond, forfeiture ofReduction in surety amountForfeiture of entire bond of surety by court without proof of mala fide or personal gain of suretyProprietyAccused was granted bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000Applicant stood surety for accused, who absconded after getting bailTrial Court forfeited entire bond of surety and imposed full fine on surety of Rs.50,000

Surety contended that he stood surety only on humanitarian grounds and gained no monetary benefit in such regard; that he made all possible efforts to produce the accused, and that he was a poor person with a large family and did not have sufficient sources of income

Validity

Imposing entire fine upon the surety without any proof of mala fide or personal gain was not justified

Record did not show as to what inquiry , if any, had been made before the Trial Court in assessing the surety's laxity/carelessness or otherwise in his efforts to produce the accused

Revision application was allowed, amount of surety forfeited was reduced from Rs.50,000 each to Rs.37,000 and applicant was directed to deposit the same before the Trial Court within one month.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reduction in surety amount", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940307

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reduction in surety amount"

MLD 2011
2011-January-24

2011 M L D 940

IMDAD HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2001
Criminal Revision No.283 of 1999, heard on 11th January, 2000.

2001 P Cr

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 1995
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.431 of 1994, decided on 4th August 1994.

1995 M L D 197

FAZLUR REHMAN alias WAZIR‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2014
2013-October-22

2014 M L D 486

IRFAN YAQOOB — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
MLD 2009
2008-April-15

2009 M L D 41

Mst. FARIDA NAEEM — Plaintiff Versus BAHADUR KHAN and 2 others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2005
Criminal Petition No.49-K of 2004, decided on 1st July, 2004.

2005 S C M R 1875

NISAR AHMED DINA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLRN 2018
Cr. Revision Application No.S-09 of 2016, decided on 18th February, 2016.

2018 Y L R Note 60

FIDA HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)
MLD 2013
2012-November-26

2013 M L D 872

SIKANDER ALI — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 2013
2012-July-25

2013 P Cr

ALI GOHAR TANGWANI — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
YLR 2005
Criminal Appeal No.59 of 2003, decided on 11th October. 2004.

2005 Y L R 471

MUHAMMAD AYYUB‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUZAFFAR KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)