Essential proof
Essential proof legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Court could not decree such suit without seeking ownership proof qua disputed property from plaintiff.
Mere to be user for innumerable years would not confer prescriptive right of easement, rather same must be openly enjoyed by any person claiming title thereto as an easement and as of right without interruption for 20 years
Person claiming prescriptive right of easement would be bound to prove same without any discrepancy in accordance with law
Plaintiff claiming passage over land of defendant as right of easement as necessity would have to prove that if such right was not given to him, then his property would be ruined
Where another road was available leading to plaintiff's property, then right of easement as necessity would not be available to him
Principles.
"Essential proof", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940315
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Essential proof"
1995CLC735
Mst. AFROZ QURESHI and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM SIDDIQUI‑‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 2015 Peshawar 121
MUHAMMAD HAROON KHAN — Appellant Versus M. ARIF KHAN — Respondent
Court: High Court2013 M L D 1818
LIAQAT ALI through L.Rs. — Petitioner Versus KHALID MEHMOOD and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2020 Y L R 2448
Mst. GUL ADAM and another — Appellants Versus ASHRAF AMAN and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtP L D 1994 Peshawar 10
SHER MUHAMMAD, and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL HAKIM and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑Art. 2(1)(c)‑‑‑Evidence‑‑‑Appreciation of‑‑‑Mere deposition of a close relative (uncle) of a party in favour of its rival would not by itself be a ground to attach absolute evidentiary value to his testimony particularly, when such witness had admitted to be on inimical terms with his defendant relative‑‑To place implicit reliance on the evidence of such a highly interested witness was not warranted.‑‑Witness.2013 M L D 947
Hafiz RIAZ AHMAD and others — Petitioners Versus KHURSHED AHMAD and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2003 Supreme Court 512
MUHAMMAD SALEEM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2013 C L C 379
KHAN BADSHAH — Petitioner Versus Mst. NOOR NAMA — Respondent
Court: PeshawarP L D 2016 Lahore 383
ABDUL MAJEED through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus ABDUL RASHEED and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1998 M L D 837
Mst. JANNAT BIBI — Petitioner Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD — Respondent
Court: Lahore